Pristocera, Klug, 1808

Azevedo, Celso O., Alencar, Isabel D. C. C. & Colombo, Wesley D., 2018, Pairs in copulation of the highly dimorphic genus Pristocera Klug (Hymenoptera, Bethylidae) from Madagascar solve taxonomic problems of male-female associations, Zootaxa 4433 (1), pp. 1-49 : 3-4

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4433.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:214DCE5C-1FD2-4D53-97A5-1919CB1AC21F

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5951441

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/976387DD-5870-FFDB-E7F5-FA2EFA21FDA4

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Pristocera
status

 

Key to species of Pristocera from Madagascar for males

1. Mandible with four distal teeth........................................................................... 2

- Mandible with five distal teeth........................................................................... 4

2. Petiole very setose in ventral view (Fig. 9D); hypopygium with inner margin not dentate (Fig. 9I); genitalia with apical lobes long, ocuppying more than apical half of aedeagus; lateral margin of aedeagus parallel (Fig. 9J–K)...... P. julieni sp. nov.

- Petiole glabrous in ventral view ( Fig. 13E View FIGURE 13 ); hypopygium with inner margin dentate, at least partially ( Figs 13J View FIGURE 13 , 21F View FIGURE 21 ); genitalia with apical lobes short, ocuppying less than apical half of aedeagus; lateral margin of aedeagus sinouos ( Fig. 13K View FIGURE 13 )........ 3

3. Petiole with midlength 4.0 × midwidth; hypopygeal chamber with latero-basal margin somewhat angled ( Fig. 21F View FIGURE 21 ); paramere shorter than basiparamere; subbifid, apical margin strongly emarginated, digitiform process absent ( Fig. 21G–H View FIGURE 21 ).............................................................................................. P. levicolllis (Kieffer)

- Petiole with midlength 5.0 × midwidth; hypopygeal chamber with latero-basal margin smoothly curved ( Fig. 13J View FIGURE 13 ); paramere longer than basiparamere; apical margin outcurved, digitiform process present, thin, very short ( Fig. 13K–L View FIGURE 13 ).................................................................................................. P. mauricei sp. nov.

4. Petiole very long and tubular, midlength 6.5 × midwidth ( Fig. 17E View FIGURE 17 ); hypopygium with apical third abruptly narrower than base ( Fig. 17K View FIGURE 17 ); paramere without digitiform process; aedeagus subcircular ( Fig. 17L–M View FIGURE 17 )................... P. teetsi sp. nov.

- Petiole never so long and tubular, midlength 5.0 × midwidth at maximum; hypopygium with apex somewhat narrower than base; paramere with digitiform process; aedeagus generally subconical........................................... 5

5. Basivolsella ventral surface folded....................................................................... 6

- Basivolsella ventral surface smooth...................................................................... 7

6. Hypopygium with apex beak-like (Fig. 5K); paramere with digitiform process curved upward (Fig. 5L)... P. martyi sp. nov.

- Hypopygium with apex hook-like ( Fig. 15J View FIGURE 15 ); paramere with digitiform process not curved upward ( Fig. 15K View FIGURE 15 )................................................................................................. P. makungai sp. nov.

7. Hypopygium with apex hook-like (Fig. 3K)..................................................... P. alexi sp. nov.

- Hypopygium with apex beak-like (Fig. 1K)................................................................ 8

8. Parameral apex very curved inward; digitiform process apical in dorsal view ( Fig. 23 J–K View FIGURE 23 ); apical margin with small spine in ventral view ( Fig. 23 K View FIGURE 23 ); dorsal margin sinuous ( Fig. 23 J View FIGURE 23 )............................................ P. cambouei

- Parameral apex not curved inward; digitiform process placed subapically in dorsal view; apical margin without small spine in ventral view; dorsal margin convex....................................................................... 9

9. Parameral apical margin at least somewhat concave (Fig. 1M; 19 L)............................................ 10

- Parameral apical margin convex ( Fig. 11J View FIGURE 11 )................................................................. 11

10. Parameral apical margin strongly concave (Fig. 1M).......................................... P. melmani sp. nov.

- Parameral apical margin somewhat concave ( Fig. 19L View FIGURE 19 ).......................................... P. zubai sp. nov.

11. Paramere very expanded in dorsal view, about 2.0 × basiparamere width ( Fig. 11I View FIGURE 11 ).................... P. morti sp. nov.

- Paramere moderately large expanded in dorsal view, about 1.4 × basiparamere width (Fig. 7H).......... P. gloriae sp. nov.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Bethylidae

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF