Arvicola scherman Shaw 1801

Wilson, Don E. & Reeder, DeeAnn, 2005, Order Rodentia - Family Cricetidae, Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 2, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 955-1189 : 965

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7316535

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/975E0181-A86F-AAF1-5C8F-0785B8CF2D1D

treatment provided by

Guido

scientific name

Arvicola scherman Shaw 1801
status

 

Arvicola scherman Shaw 1801

Arvicola scherman Shaw 1801 , Gen. Zool., Part II, Pt. 1: 75.

Type Locality: Germany, Strassburg.

Vernacular Names: Montane Water Vole.

Synonyms: Arvicola albus (Bechstein 1801) ; Arvicola argentoratensis Desmarest 1822 ; Arvicola buffonii (Fischer 1829) ; Arvicola cantabriae Ventura and Gosálbez 1989 ; Arvicola canus (Bechstein 1801) ; Arvicola castaneus de Sélys Longchamps 1845 ; Arvicola exilis Lydekker 1910 ; Arvicola exitus Miller 1910 ; Arvicola gutsulius Zagorodnyuk 2000 ; Arvicola monticola de Sélys Longchamps 1838 ; Arvicola minor (Leske 1779) ; Arvicola niger de Sélys Longchamps 1845 ; Arvicola schermaus (Hermann 1804) .

Distribution: Mountains of N Spain, through C Europe (S Netherlands to SC France and eastwards to Slovakia), to C Romania ( Panteleyev, 2000:Fig. 2).

Discussion: Earlier recognized as a species ( Trouessart, 1910; Miller, 1912 a; Hinton, 1926 a; Ognev, 1950) until Ellerman and Morrison-Scott (1951) reassigned scherman as another subspecies of an all-embracing terrestris , a classification observed through the late 1900s ( Gromov and Polyakov, 1977; Corbet, 1978 c, 1984; Honacki et al., 1982; Corbet and Hill, 1991; Musser and Carleton, 1993). However, the two long known ecological morphotypes clearly correspond to two biological species: an amphibious form ( A. amphibius ) that is widely distributed in Eurasia, and a smaller fossorial species ( A. scherman ) isolated in certain European mountains (Alps, Carpathians, Cantabrian, Massif Central, Pyrenees). They contrast in body mass, pelage coloration, social behavior, mating system, use of space, cranial size and shape, and incisor protrusion (LaVille, 1989; Mitchell-Jones et al., 1999; Panteleyev, 1996; Sausy, 2000; Warmerdam, 1982). In the Netherlands and Belgium, Warmerdam (1982) meticuously characterized the geographic complementarity and morphometric discrimination of the two forms, as did Panteleyev (1996) in a geographically broader synopsis of the two. Although both authors ultimately retained the fossorial scherman as a distinctive race of terrestris (here = A. amphibius ), theirs is an exceptionally robust application of subspecies usage. Based on this persuasive body of literature, coupled with examinations of AMNH and USNM series, we can only endorse the recent views of Panteleyev (2000) and Zagorodnyuk (1992 b, c, 2000) in acknowledging scherman as a species. Genetic distances based on allozymic analysis are slightly less between samples of A. scherman and A. amphibius than are any pair-wise comparisons among 10 Microtus species sampled by Mezhzherin et al. (1993).

AMNH

American Museum of Natural History

USNM

Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Chordata

Class

Mammalia

Order

Rodentia

Family

Cricetidae

Genus

Arvicola

Loc

Arvicola scherman Shaw 1801

Wilson, Don E. & Reeder, DeeAnn 2005
2005
Loc

Arvicola scherman

Shaw 1801: 75
1801
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF