Melanesiandra solomonensis ( Arigony, 1983 ), 2010

Santos-Silva, Antonio, Heffern, Daniel & Matsuda, Kiyoshi, 2010, Revision of Hawaiian, Australasian, Oriental, and Japanese Parandrinae (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae), Insecta Mundi 2010 (130), pp. 1-120 : 45-47

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5164485

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5169094

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/975887B7-FFE5-FFD9-66D0-FA5817DF32D6

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Melanesiandra solomonensis ( Arigony, 1983 )
status

 

Melanesiandra solomonensis ( Arigony, 1983) View in CoL

( Fig. 24, 25 View Figure 1-44 , 83 View Figure 75-89 , 136, 137 View Figure 118-147 , 223 View Figure 218-234 , 266 View Figure 252-276. 252-257 , 327 View Figure 323-328 , 379-381 View Figure 379-384 )

Parandra solomonensis Arigony, 1983: 40 View in CoL , fig. 1-18; 1984: 89, 94, 95, 96, 97, 111, 115, fig. 51, 63-66; Santos-Silva 2002: 32 (note).

Birandra (Birandra) solomonensis View in CoL ; Santos-Silva and Shute 2009: 32.

Description. Integument shining, dark-brown; anterior edge of head, parts of mandibles, lateral edges of pronotum and of scutellum, and elytral suture blackish or very dark-brown.

Male ( Fig. 379 View Figure 379-384 ). Head wide, proportionally very large in relation to body size; gibbosities of dorsal surface with punctures coarse, abundant and not confluent; area between gibbosities and ocular carina smooth; area near ocular posterior edge and of occiput with coarse punctation; area behind eyes with punctures very coarse, abundant, in part confluent. Central region of clypeus strongly convex together with labrum. Central projection of labrum ( Fig. 24 View Figure 1-44 ), very distinct, wide, and with one small projection on each side. Eyes ( Fig. 83 View Figure 75-89 ) emarginate. Mandibles ( Fig. 136 View Figure 118-147 ) falciform, as long as or just shorter than head; inner margin with two large teeth together protracted. Submentum clearly delimited by fine suture; surface coarsely and abundantly punctate; margin close to mentum wide and barely elevated; pilosity moderately short and very sparse. Antennae not notably short (reaching basal fourth of pronotum); ventral sensorial area of antennae ( Fig. 223 View Figure 218-234 ) visible from side only in apical antennomeres; ventral sensorial area of antennomeres III-V not divided by carina; remaining antennomeres divided by carina gradually more elevated towards antennomere XI; dorsal sensorial area of antennomere XI large.

Pronotum convex; disc punctation fine and sparse, gradually coarser laterally (mainly towards anterior angles); anterior margin concave; anterior angles not projected forward; lateral angles well marked, rounded or obtuse; posterior angle well marked. Elytra finely and abundantly punctate (punctures just coarser laterally); elytral carinae absent. Metasternum with some coarse punctures. Metafemur ( Fig. 380 View Figure 379-384 ) moderately short. Metatarsus (without claws) ( Fig. 266 View Figure 252-276. 252-257 ) longer than metatibia; metatarsomere V longer than I-III together.

Female ( Fig. 381 View Figure 379-384 ). Dorsal surface of head and area behind eyes with same kind of punctuation as in males, except sparser. Central projection of labrum ( Fig. 25 View Figure 1-44 ) narrow and rounded or subacute, without lateral projections. Mandibles as in Fig. 137 View Figure 118-147 .

Variability. Integument brown to dark-brown. Males: dorsal surface of head, between gibbosities and ocular carina, with some fine punctures; submentum clearly delimited by fine suture just laterally; antennae notably short (reaching the basal third of pronotum); antennomeres III-VI or III-VII not divided by carina; elytral punctures fine; elytral carinae barely visible.

Dimensions in mm (M / F). Total length (including mandibles), 16.8-20.5/17.7-20.0; prothorax: length, 3.4-4.3/3.5-4.2; anterior width, 4.5-5.5/4.4-4.8; posterior width, 3.6-4.3/4.1-4.6; humeral width, 4.4-5.4/ 5.0-5.7; elytral length, 9.4-11.3/10.3-11.9.

Geographical distribution ( Fig. 327 View Figure 323-328 ). Solomon Islands (Santa Ana Island, Santa Isabel Island).

Material examined. (6 M, 4 F), as follows: SOLOMON ISLANDS. Isabel: Santa Isabel Island (Molao), paratype F, VI.29.1960, C. W. O’Brien coll. ( MCNZ). Makira-Ulawa: Santa Ana Island , 2 paratypes M, 1 paratype F, [no date indicated] ( MCNZ) ; 3 M, 2 F [no date indicated] ( USNM); M, [no date indicated] ( MZSP); paratype F, [no date indicated] ( MZSP) .

Types, type locality. Holotype M, from Solomon Islands, Santa Ana Island, deposited at SMTD. Arigony (1983) stated that the material examined from the Solomon Islands included two pairs (deposited at the Museu de Ciências Naturais da FundaÇÃo Zoobotânica [MCN], Porto Alegre), the holotype and some paratypes (from Staaliches Mueum für Tierkunde [ SMTD] Dresden), and the other paratypes at Bernice P. Bishop Museum ( BPBM), Honolulu and Smithisonian Institution – United States National Museum ( USNM), Washington. However, in the list of type material she listed: holotype at SMTD; 3 M and 2 F at MCN (paratypes), therefore, 5 paratypes and not two pairs; 3 M and 4 F at SMTD (paratypes); 1 F at BPBM. Therefore, there are not any types deposited at USNM, and there are five paratypes deposited at MCNZ (= MCN). Besides, one of the paratypes (female) deposited at MCNZ is not from Santa Ana Island, but from Santa Isabel Island, and the paratypes are 2 M and 3 F, not 3 M and 2 F. The number of males and females deposited at MCNZ was clearly an error, because Arigony (op.cit.) wrote in the list of type material: “3 [male symbol] MCN 56502, 56503, 2 [female symbol] MCN 56501, 56504, 61212”. We received all specimens of Parandrinae from the Oriental province deposited at USNM, among which, there are specimens of M. solomonensis , but none of them have a type label. Additionally, even if one of those specimens had a type label, it would not be a type, because it was not recorded in the list of type material. One paratype female originally deposited at MCNZ is currently deposited at MZSP (donation of Dr. Maria Helena Galileo). We concluded that the paratype female from Santa Isabel Island belongs to BPBM, and was forgotten in MCNZ by Tania Arigony. Dr. Maria Helena Galileo ( MCNZ) authorized us to return the paratype to BPBM. This paratype from Santa Isabel Island was collected on VI.29.1960, and not VI.24.1960, as written by Arigony (1983). Additionally, this paratype has the number 61212, the same number listed by Arigony (1983) as a female from Santa Ana Island, deposited at MCNZ.

The most important problem, related to the “ paratype ” from Santa Isabel Island, is that the specimen is not a female of M. solomonensis , but a female of M. bougainvillensis .

Comments. Although the general appearance of the males of M. solomonensis ( Fig. 379 View Figure 379-384 ) is very different from that of M. striatifrons ( Fig. 376 View Figure 373-378 ), the females of both species are very similar, mainly in head shape.

MCNZ

Porto Alegre, Museu de Ciencias Naturais da Fundacao Zoo-Botanica do Rio Grande do Sul

USNM

Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History

MZSP

Sao Paulo, Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de Sao Paulo

BPBM

Bishop Museum

MCN

McNeese State University

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Cerambycidae

Genus

Melanesiandra

Loc

Melanesiandra solomonensis ( Arigony, 1983 )

Santos-Silva, Antonio, Heffern, Daniel & Matsuda, Kiyoshi 2010
2010
Loc

Birandra (Birandra) solomonensis

Santos-Silva, A. & S. Shute 2009: 32
2009
Loc

Parandra solomonensis

Santos-Silva, A. 2002: 32
Arigony, T. H. A. 1983: 40
1983
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF