Caledonandra passandroides ( Thomson, 1867 )

Santos-Silva, Antonio, Heffern, Daniel & Matsuda, Kiyoshi, 2010, Revision of Hawaiian, Australasian, Oriental, and Japanese Parandrinae (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae), Insecta Mundi 2010 (130), pp. 1-120 : 49-50

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5164485

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8400293

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/975887B7-FFE1-FFDD-66D0-FA9813D13331

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Caledonandra passandroides ( Thomson, 1867 )
status

 

Caledonandra passandroides ( Thomson, 1867) View in CoL

( Fig. 14, 15 View Figure 1-44 , 81 View Figure 75-89 , 132, 133 View Figure 118-147 , 198 View Figure 177-199. 177-195 , 213 View Figure 210-217. 210-214 , 221 View Figure 218-234 , 264 View Figure 252-276. 252-257 , 325 View Figure 323-328 , 373-375 View Figure 373-378 )

Parandra passandroides Thomson, 1867: 107 View in CoL , 116; Lameere 1902: 94, 104; Fauvel 1906: 40; Hayashi 1961b: 10; Webb 1994: 327 (note); Jenis 2008: 117.

Parandra Passandroides View in CoL ; Thomson 1878: 4 (type).

Parandra (Parandra) passandroides View in CoL ; Lameere 1913: 6 (cat.); 1919: 18; Arigony 1984: 114; Santos-Silva 2002: 32 (note).

Birandra (Birandra) passandroides View in CoL ; Santos-Silva and Shute 2009: 32.

Description. Integument shining, dark-brown; dorsal and lateral contour of mandibles, and elytral suture blackish.

Male ( Fig. 373 View Figure 373-378 ). Head wide, proportionally very large in relation to body size; dorsal surface nearly planar to sides of depression in “V”, without gibbosities or with gibbosities barely defined; punctation fine near clypeus, gradually coarser towards the occiput and areas near ocular carina, not confluent; area behind eyes with coarse punctures, deep, in part confluent; area between the depression in “V” and ocular carina, near clypeus, with circular depression, deep; ocular carina low, not bifurcated in “Y” near the posterior edge of the eyes ( Fig. 373 View Figure 373-378 ). Eyes ( Fig. 81 View Figure 75-89 ) moderately narrow. Labrum clearly oblique; central projection ( Fig. 14 View Figure 1-44 ) strongly sculptured: two strong tubercles, projected forward; semi-circular projection, elevated, distinctly more prominent in relation to areas to sides and center (each tip of arc starts at the base of the tubercles, see again, Fig 14 View Figure 1-44 ). Maxillary palp as in Fig. 198 View Figure 177-199. 177-195 . Submentum slightly elevated in central area, clearly separated from gula and part of gena, by semi-circular furrow, large moderately deep; punctation fine and sparse; edge close to mentum moderately narrow and elevated, preceded by large depression, deep throughout; pilosity very short and sparse. Mandibles as in Fig. 132 View Figure 118-147 . Antennae ( Fig. 221 View Figure 218-234 ) reaching or almost reaching basal fifth of prothorax.

Pronotum finely punctate laterally; center of disc with punctation very fine and sparse; anterior angles not projected forward; anterior margin concave. Elytra very finely punctate, mainly towards the suture; elytral carinae absent. Wings as in Fig. 213 View Figure 210-217. 210-214 . Metasternum with coarse, shallow punctures at sides. Metafemora as in Fig. 374 View Figure 373-378 . Metatarsus (without claws) approximately as long as metatibia (including apical spines); metatarsomere V ( Fig. 264 View Figure 252-276. 252-257 ) as long as I-III together.

Female ( Fig. 375 View Figure 373-378 ). Punctation of head like in males. Depression in “V” of the dorsal face of head shallower than in males. Labrum without tubercles and without semi-circular projection; apex ( Fig. 15 View Figure 1-44 ) narrow and rounded. Submentum without transverse depression close to anterior edge. Mandibles as in Fig. 133 View Figure 118-147 . Anterior angles of prothorax projected forward; anterior margin slightly sinuous (central area clearly concave).

Variability. Integument pale-brown to dark-brown; submentum completely blackish; legs brown. Males: depression semi-circular on dorsal face of head moderately shallow and barely defined; area behind eyes with punctures shallow; surface of submentum strongly furrowed transversely; area close to anterior margin of submentum with furrow narrow and very deep; submentum glabrous; center of pronotal disc smooth; metatarsus (without claws) longer than metatibia (length equals to 0.9 times). Female: depression in “V” of dorsal face of head like in males; submentum with transverse depression, shallow, close to anterior edge.

Dimensions in mm (M / F). Total length (including mandibles), 12.3-21.0/13.9-18.9; prothorax: length, 2.3-3.7/2.7-3.7; anterior width, 3.2-5.6/3.6-4.5; posterior width, 2.7-4.4/3.2-4.4; humeral width, 3.2-5.5/ 3.7-5.4; elytral length, 6.7-10.6/8.3-10.7.

Geographical distribution ( Fig. 325 View Figure 323-328 ). New Caledonia (Grande Terre, Ouvéa, Lifou).

Material examined. (14 M, 10 F), as follows: new caledonia. F, [date not indicated], Deyr. coll. ( MCGD); F, [date not indicated] ( MCGD); 3 M, 4 F, [date not indicated] ( IRSN); 2 M, 1878, Deyr. coll. ( MCGD); M, F, XII.1-7.2006, Ivo Jenis coll. ( ZKCO). Grande Terre : Me Jejehari (750 m; 165 o 36’30”E, 21 o 28’45S), M, XI.5.1986, Brown coll. ( MEMU) GoogleMaps ; Mount Panié (250 m), M, F, X.30.1986, Brown coll. ( MEMU) ; Ouril (60 miles of Nouméa), M, ex. Fauvel Collection, [date not indicated] ( MZSP) ; Sarraméa , M, F, XII.27.2006- I.10.2007, Ivo Jenis coll. ( ZKCO) ; Tonghoué , M, F, [date not indicated] ( IRSN) ; Table Unio Road (21 o 34’S, 165 o 46’E; 600 m), 2 M, 14.XI.2000, Bouchard, Burwell, Monteith coll. ( QMCO). Lifou: M, [no date indicated] ( IRSN) GoogleMaps .

Type, type locality. Holotype M, from New Caledonia, deposited at MNHN.

Comments. One of the authors (K. Matsuda) photographed three “types” in the collection of the MNHN: 1 lectotype male; 1 paralectotype male; and 1 paralectotype female. The designations of lectotype and paralectotype were never published. Therefore, the labels fixed on each of the specimens have no value. Besides, Thomson (1867) wrote: “Long 17 mill.; lat. 5 mill.” That indicates that Thomson (1867) had just one specimen, because when he had more than one, he indicated the measurements, for example, in Parandra sayi described in the same work: “Long. 11-17 mill.; lat. 3 1/2-5 1/2 mill.”. Thomson (1867) also did not know the female of P. passandroides , which, by itself, immediately excludes the “ paralectotype ” female. Thomson (1867) also stated at the end of his description that he had one specimen given to him by Fauvel. Besides, Thomson (1867) wrote: “prothorax sublaevis, antice quase rectus” [English translation: “prothorax almost smooth, anteriorly almost straight”]. That description of the anterior margin of the prothorax fits better to the male that has the label of “ Lectotype ” than the other. We believe that the holotype is the specimen that has the label of “Type” (characteristic of the types of the J. Thomson Collection) and “ Lectotype ”. The other two specimens that have labels of “ paralectotype ” should not be considered as types.

IRSN

Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique

MZSP

Sao Paulo, Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de Sao Paulo

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Cerambycidae

Genus

Caledonandra

Loc

Caledonandra passandroides ( Thomson, 1867 )

Santos-Silva, Antonio, Heffern, Daniel & Matsuda, Kiyoshi 2010
2010
Loc

Parandra passandroides

Fauvel, A. 1906: 40
Lameere, A. A. 1902: 94
Thomson, J. 1867: 107
1867
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF