Napora lomoalta Hull, 1997
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5372196 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8BF4D0FF-F247-4B92-B327-0D647B01C386 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/943E87C0-FFDE-FF86-FCF2-6980FBEAF037 |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Napora lomoalta Hull, 1997 |
status |
|
Napora lomoalta Hull, 1997 ( Fig. 29A, B View FIG )
Napora sp. aff. pyramidalis – Kiessling 1995: pl. 60, figs 14, 15; 1999: 72, pl. 14, fig. 12.
Napora lomoalta Hull, 1997: 118 , pl. 45, figs 9, 21; pl. 46, figs 1, 16, 19, 21, 23.
MATERIAL EXAMINED. — 15 specimens from sample Mue 22.
OCCURRENCE. — Lower to upper Tithonian (Zone 4, Subzones 4 beta and alpha of Pessagno et al. 1993) in Antarctic Peninsula, Stanley Mountain, California Coast Ranges, and lower Tithonian ( Hybonotum Zone ) in Solnhofen area, Germany.
REMARKS
Some specimens herein assigned to this species resemble very well the holotype, others have a more robust thorax. Very few specimens have two to three small spines on the distal end of feet. All are pyramidal as the type specimens, with a well perforate subtriangular cephalis, and a massive apical horn at base, composed of several ridges which converge distally to form a more slender triradiate horn. Nodes of subsidiary spines are very weakly developed, as in the holotype, with two to three very small thorns in each node. Unlike the topotype, most of our specimens have a rather well preserved velum; it is triangular in cross-section, thin-walled, and as long as thorax. Some specimens have also one or two small spines on the distal end of some feet.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Napora lomoalta Hull, 1997
Dumitrica, Paulian & Zügel, Peter 2003 |
Napora lomoalta
HULL D. & MEYERHOFF 1997: 118 |