Lotagnostus, Whitehouse, 1936
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5422.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AE955C5E-803E-44CB-A3B2-9C2616D9F185 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/926387DB-FF9D-CA00-FF38-86E7FCD41628 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Lotagnostus |
status |
|
Lotagnostus View in CoL aff. L. nolani
( Plate 8.18–8.19 View PLATE 8 )
Material and occurrence. Lotagnostus rushtoni Fauna : collection D3381-CO (2-1); 5-22-08D (1-1) from the Windfall Formation at Ninemile Canyon, Nevada.
Discussion. Strongly scrobiculate Lotagnostus sclerites are rare in collections of the L. rushtoni Fauna , and all but two cephala were too small or fragmentary for meaningful comparison with L. nolani and similar species. However, those cephala differ from those of L. nolani in having a more posteriorly positioned glabellar node situated at the rear of M2, centered in line with or just in front of the anterior tips of basal lobes. The largest and best preserved cephalon also displays a significantly lower ratio ( Figure 10.3 View FIGURE 10 ) between preglabellar field length (PFL) and anteroglabella length (AAL). In L. nolani the PFL/AAL ratio averages 0.81, with the lowest recorded value being 0.63. That of the best L. aff. L. nolani cephalon is 0.62.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.