Touitini
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1206/0003-0090.468.1.1 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8D5487F9-9C78-FFE1-FCD9-FD234C6D2A1F |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Touitini |
status |
|
Amoropsittacini/ Touitini
We acknowledge the recent introduction of Touitini by Sangster et al. (2023) to encompass the genera Touit , Bolborhynchus , Psilopsiagon , and Nannopsittaca , and thereby replacing Amoropsittacini Brereton, 1963. As noted above, we similarly acknowledge concomitant preparation of a counterargument by Schodde et al. (submitted) to conserve the family-group name Amoropsittacidae Brereton, 1963. If accepted, the latter still allows retention of Touitini for recognition as a monotypic tribe i.e., containing only Touit . Until this is resolved, we use Touitini for Touit and Amoropsittacini for the other three genera for reasons we now outline.
There was a deep divergence that dates to 21.1 Mya (13.7–25.5) between Touit and the clade containing Bolborhynchus , Psilopsiagon , and Nannospsittaca, which in turn exhibits a basal divergence dating to 16.9 Mya (10.3–21; fig. 5). Based on these deep divergences, we advocate recognition of two tribes, one for Touit and one for Bolborhynchus , Psilopsiagon , and Nannopsittaca , this decision being driven largely by the molecular data.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |