Dysdera dushengi Lin, Chang et Li, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5006.1.10 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:251E38AC-1DDD-4AAD-8673-BCC7B0A179F8 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/895C87A9-E101-AF02-FF0C-3E87FB1AFCAB |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Dysdera dushengi Lin, Chang et Li, 2020 |
status |
|
Dysdera dushengi Lin, Chang et Li, 2020 View in CoL
Figs 3–4 View FIGURES 1–6 , 13–18 View FIGURES 13–18 , 26 View FIGURES 25–30 , 34–36 View FIGURES 31–36 , 41–43 View FIGURES 41–46 , 52–53 View FIGURES 50–57 , 58–60. View FIGURES 58–60
D. dushengi Lin, Chang et Li, 2020: 100 View in CoL View Cited Treatment , f. 1A–D, 2A–B, 3, 4A–C, 5C (♂ ♀).
Material. KAZAKHSTAN: Almaty Region: ♂ ♀ ( ISEA, 001.8644), c. 15 km NNW from Karabastau Village, Tyr- nakty Natural Boundary , 43°53’N 75°30’E, 850–950 m, 20– 22.04.2016, R. Yu. Dudko GoogleMaps .
Diagnosis. The male of D. dushengi is most similar to that of D. pamirica from Tajikistan in having the semi-
elliptical median crest (Cm), the abducted retrolateral crest (Cr) and the psembolus being two times longer than the tegulum (Te), but can be distinguished from it by having the tegulum and the psembolus being stretched in almost a straight line (compared to a 130° angle between them in D. pamirica ), the median crest being two times shorter than the tegulum (equal in length in D. pamirica ) and the hooked apex (Ax) of psembolus (straight in D. pamirica ) (cf. Figs 34–36 View FIGURES 31–36 , 41–43 View FIGURES 41–46 and figs 7–9 in Dunin (1992)). The female of D. dushengi is also similar to that of D. pamirica in the shape of trapezoidal dorsal arch of the diverticulum (Dd), but differs in having a distinct stalk (Sk) of the spermatheca which is absent from D. pamirica (cf. Figs 52–53 View FIGURES 50–57 and fig. 10 in Dunin (1992)).
Description. Male. Total length 7.4. Carapace: 3.15 long, 2.45 wide. Abdomen: 4.25 long, 1.95 wide. AME 0.17, PME 0.14, PLE 0.14. General appearance as in Figs 3 View FIGURES 1–6 , 13–15 View FIGURES 13–18 . Prosoma and chelicerae orange. Palps and legs yellow. Abdomen and spinnerets beige. Leg measurements: I: 2.85, 1.75, 2.55, 2.7, 0.7 (10.55). II: 2.65, 1.55, 2.3, 2.55, 0.65 (9.7). III: 2.05, 1.15, 1.35, 2.1, 0.55 (7.2). IV: 2.65, 1.35, 2.1, 2.6, 0.65 (9.35). Leg spination: I: Fe p3. II: Fe p3. III: Fe p3 r1; Ti p5 r3 v6; Mt p6 r3 v2. IV: Fe d8 r1; Ti p4 r5 v6; Mt p4 r3 v5. Bulb as in Figs 26 View FIGURES 25–30 , 34–36 View FIGURES 31–36 , 41–43 View FIGURES 41–46 . Length/width ratio 3.2. Posterior apophysis (Ap) lanceolate in lateral view. Psembolus with three crests that differ in shapes: obovate median crest, semi-oval prolateral crest (Cp) and triangular retrolateral crest. Psembolus apex bent towards median crest.
Female. Total length unknown (specimen with damaged abdomen). Carapace: 3.2 long 2.45 wide. AME 0.17, PME 0.14, PLE 0.16. Coloration as in male ( Figs 4 View FIGURES 1–6 , 16–18 View FIGURES 13–18 ). Leg measurements: I: 2.7, 1.65, 2.3, 2.35, 0.6 (9.6). II: 2.4, 1.5, 2.0, 2.2, 0.6 (8.7). III: 1.95, 1.1, 1.3, 1.9, 0.55 (6.8). IV: 2.5, 1.4, 2.0, 2.45, 0.65 (9.0). Leg spination: I: Fe p3. II: Fe p2. III: Fe d1 p3 r1; Ti p4 r3 v6; Mt p6 r4 v3. IV: Fe d6 r1; Ti p4 r3 v6; Mt p6 r4 v5. Endogyne as in Figs 52–53 View FIGURES 50–57 . Spermatheca (St) fusiform, with pointed lateral arms (La) and clearly visible stalk. Dorsal arch of diverticu- lum trapezoidal, twice as long as wide. Transverse bar of the posterior diverticulum (Tb) straight, two times wider than spermatheca. Posterior diverticulum (Pd) square.
Distribution. Until now, the species has been known only from the type locality, the westernmost part of Xinji- ang Province of China, neighbouring Kazakhstan ( Figs 58–59 View FIGURES 58–60 ). The present record in Almaty Region of Kazakhstan represents the westernmost limit of the species range. Both localities lie in the Ili River valley.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Dysdera dushengi Lin, Chang et Li, 2020
Fomichev, Alexander A. & Marusik, Yuri M. 2021 |