Xenotrypa argentinensis, Ernst & Carrera, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/geodiversitas2022v44a20 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5EC74771-0B7B-494D-ADC8-79BECD097A3A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6723045 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/67915CAA-948A-462B-A581-8549E84C7F8A |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:67915CAA-948A-462B-A581-8549E84C7F8A |
treatment provided by |
Admin |
scientific name |
Xenotrypa argentinensis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Xenotrypa argentinensis n. sp.
( Figs 4 View FIG F-G; 5A-E; Appendix 1)
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:67915CAA-948A-462B-A581-8549E84C7F8A
HOLOTYPE. — CEGH-UNC 27523 a, b (three thin sections of one colony).
PARATYPE. — CEGH-UNC 27521 a (thin section of one colony).
TYPE LOCALITY. — La Pola creek section near Albardon village, San Juan Province, Argentine Precordillera, western Argentina.
TYPE HORIZON. — La Pola Formation, Upper Ordovician, Sandbian.
DIAGNOSIS. — Massive multilayered colonies. Autozooecial apertures rounded-polygonal. Autozooecial diaphragms rare to absent in endozone, common in exozone, straight, thin. Vesicles abundant, 4-7 surrounding each aperture, completely isolating autozooecia. Acanthostyles relatively large, 3-6 surrounding each autozooecial aperture. Maculae not observed.
ETYMOLOGY. — The species is named after finding it in Argentina.
DESCRIPTION
Massive multilayered colonies.Autozooecia long, having polygonal transverse section in endozone. Autozooecial apertures rounded-polygonal. Autozooecial diaphragms rare to absent in endozone, common in exozone, straight, thin. Vesicles abundant, 4-7 surrounding each aperture, completely isolating autozooecia, angular in cross section, having straight or curved roofs, sealed by calcitic skeleton near colony surface. Acanthostyles relatively large, 3-6 surrounding each autozooecial aperture, originating in endozone, with distinct wide hyaline cores, rarely indenting autozooecia. Autozooecial walls indistinctly laminated, 0.008 -0.015 mm thick. Maculae not observed.
COMPARISON
The investigated material is similar to representatives of the Family Xenotrypidae which consists of two genera: Xenotrypa Bassler, 1952 and Hennigopora Bassler, 1952 . However, its assignment to a genus is difficult. The genus Xenotrypa Bassler, 1952 is known with few specimens restricted mainly to the type material of two species of the genus, Xenotrypa primaeva ( Bassler, 1911) from the Lower Ordovician of Russia, and X. bassleri Astrova, 1965 from the Middle Ordovician of Russia. The type species X. primaeva reveals large acanthostyles with centres of dark colour ( Utgaard 1983: 377, fig. 169). In contrast, acanthostyles in Hennigopora have distinct hyaline cores, like in present material. Xenotrypa argentinensis n. sp. differs from X. primaeva and X. bassleri in its smaller autozooecial apertures (aperture width at average 0.16 mm vs 0.36 mm in X. primaeva ; 0.13-0.21 mm vs 0.22-0.34 mm in X. bassleri ) as well as in more abundant acanthostyles and abundant diaphragms in autozooecia.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |