Ysachron, García & Botero & Santos-Silva, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2021.735.1243 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CF109FEA-7812-4787-A164-4F5FF0C46E21 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4555417 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B31E5244-31DC-49D7-8838-93850EEA9581 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:B31E5244-31DC-49D7-8838-93850EEA9581 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ysachron |
status |
gen. nov. |
Ysachron View in CoL gen. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:B31E5244-31DC-49D7-8838-93850EEA9581
Figs 1–12 View Figs 1–9 View Figs 10–16. 10–12
Type species
Ysachron pilosus View in CoL gen. et sp. nov., here designated.
Differential diagnosis
Ysachron gen. nov. is similar to some genera of Hesperophanini Mulsant, 1839 , Oemini and Achrysonini . Despite not having the setae between ommatidia, we allocate it in Achrysonini due to the presence of the following characteristics: eyes coarsely faceted; antennomeres unarmed; antennae in males longer than body; scape shorter than antennomere III; procoxal cavities open and not strongly angulate laterally ( Fig. 13 View Figs 10–16. 10–12 , Ysachron pilosus gen. et sp. nov.; Fig. 14 View Figs 10–16. 10–12 , Achryson surinamum (Linnaeus, 1767)) ; prosternal process without lateral projections apically; and metatibiae not carinate.
The presence or absence of setae between ommatidia is a characteristic that also varies among subtribes of Oemini ( Martins, 1997) : present in Oemina Lacordaire, 1868 , absent in Methioidina Martins, 1997 (except in Proeme Martins, 1978 ).
Although we are aware of the great similarity between the tribes Achrysonini , Hesperophanini and Oemini , Ysachron gen. nov. differs from Hesperophanini and Oemini by having procoxal cavities not strongly angulate laterally ( Figs 13–14 View Figs 10–16. 10–12 ), while they are strongly angulate in the latter two ( Figs 15–16 View Figs 10–16. 10–12 ). The new genus also differs from genera of Hesperophanini by the median lobe with the apical region shorter than basal apophysis ( Figs 27–29 View Figs 17–29 ).
Among the genera of Achrysonini , Ysachron gen. nov. is similar to Achryson by the rounded prothorax sides without projections, basal antennomeres linear, scape as long as half of the length of antennomere III, and fuscous aspect. It differs as follows: eyes lacking setae between the ommatidia; surface of the pronotum alveolate; antennae 12-segmented; elytra with long setae; and meso- and metafemora subclavate.Species of Achryson have setae between ommatidia, surface of the pronotum microsculptured, antennae 11-segmented, elytra with short setae, and femora fusiform. Also, unlike some other genera in Achrysonini , Ysachron gen. nov. does not show sexual punctation differences.
Etymology
The name Ysachron is an anagram of Achryson , a similar genus of Achrysonini . The gender is masculine.
Description
Head narrowed behind eyes, densely alveolate between upper eye lobes. Median groove well-marked between antennal tubercles. Antennal tubercles weakly elevated, with obtuse apex. Eyes coarsely
faceted, not coplanar with surface around them; without setae between ommatidia; upper eye lobes distant from each other; lower eye lobes large, about three times the length of genae. Genae small, with rounded apex. Labrum small, when together with clypeus, longer than frons. Mandibles short, with acute apex. Maxillary and labial palpi of similar length. Antennae 12-segmented, longer than body in males, as long as body in females; scape short, somewhat cylindrical, as long as about half length of antennomere III; antennomere III longer than IV. Prothorax subcylindrical; lateral margin rounded and unarmed, constricted in anterior and posterior margins. Prosternal process narrow, parallel sided, with apex curved inwards. Mesoventrite tumid. Mesoventral process emarginated at apex. Metaventrite rectangular, slightly wider than long, parallel-sided. Scutellum small. Elytra not exposing abdomen, parallel-sided; humeri rounded; base wider than posterior margin of prothorax; surface not carinate. Femora from subfusiform to slightly clavate. Tibiae slightly widened toward apex. Abdominal ventrite I the largest (including abdominal process), ventrites II–V subequal in length.
Key to South American genera of Achrysonini (modified and translated from Martins 2002 and Monné & Monné 2004)
1. Setae between ommatidia absent; antennae 12-segmented ................................. Ysachron View in CoL gen. nov.
– Setae between ommatidia present; antennae 11-segmented ............................................................. 2
2. Sides of prothorax with long spine (longer than pedicel), with curved apex backward ..................... ................................................................................................ Drascalia Fairmaire & Germain, 1864 View in CoL
– Sides of prothorax unarmed (without spines or with small gibbosity) or at most with short triangular tubercle ............................................................................................................................................. 3
3. Pronotum with two tubercles on anterior third; elytra with longitudinal elevation, more evident near base, reaching apical fourth, delimiting a flattened area near suture .. Abyarachryson Martins, 2002 View in CoL
– Pronotum without tubercles (except for small gibbosities in some species of Achryson View in CoL ); elytra uniformly convex or flattened on apical ¾ ....................................................................................... 4
4. Elytra flattened on apical ¾; metafemora linear ..................... Neoachryson Monné & Monné, 2004 View in CoL
– Elytra uniformly convex, metafemora not linear .............................................................................. 5
5. Metafemora strongly clavate ............................................................................................................ 6
– Metafemora subfusiform, with elongate club ................................................................................... 7
6. Antennomere III longer than scape and other antennomeres ...................... Huequenia Cerda, 1890 View in CoL
– Antennomere III shorter than scape and other antennomeres .............. Esseiachryson Martins, 2002 View in CoL
7. Elytra with contrasting punctures and glabrous perimeter ................... Cotyachryson Martins, 2002 View in CoL – Elytra without contrasting punctures ................................................................................................ 8
8. Basal antennomeres thickened; sides of prothorax with small central gibbosity ............................... .......................................................................................................................... Cerdaia Monné, 2006 View in CoL
– Basal antennomeres linear; sides of prothorax rounded ................................................................... 9
9. Scape about as long or slightly shorter than antennomere III; elytra with long setae and shining aspect ...................................................................................................... Xenocompsa Martins, 1965 View in CoL
– Scape about as long as half the length of antennomere III; elytra often with short setae and general aspect not shining .......................................................................... Achryson Audinet-Serville, 1833 View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |