Biscutella valentina (L.) Heywood, 1962
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4374015 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/82263516-4544-2B8C-1A3A-A95E0156E681 |
treatment provided by |
Admin |
scientific name |
Biscutella valentina (L.) Heywood |
status |
|
Sisymbrium valentinum Linnaeus View in CoL , Species Plantarum, ed. 2, 2: 920. 1763.
"Habitat in Regno Valentino, Madriti. Loefling." RCN: 4791.
Lectotype ( García Adá & al. in Candollea 51: 374. 1996): Löfling 474, Herb. Linn. No. 836.27 ( LINN) .
Current name: Biscutella valentina (L.) Heywood View in CoL ( Brassicaceae ).
Note: See extensive discussion by García Adá & al. (in Candollea 51: 374-375. 1996). They conclude that the name must be typified by the Löfling material, which does not correspond with usage of the name, and suggest that the name should be proposed for rejection. López (in Taxon 48: 161. 1999) formally proposed the rejection of the name. Biscutella stenophylla Dufour would have become the correct name for this taxon had rejection been approved. Mateo & Crespo (in Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 132: 14-19. 2000) also discussed the identity of the original elements but disagreed over the desirability of rejecting the name. The Committee for Spermatophyta (in Taxon 49: 802. 2000), however, did not recommend rejection.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Biscutella valentina (L.) Heywood
Jarvis, Charlie 2007 |
Sisymbrium valentinum
Linnaeus 1763: 920 |