Batrachopus, , Olsen & Padian, 1986
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/geodiversitas2024v46a8 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:431B0382-9073-4676-9EC6-B3CB6A15589D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11517596 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/813387CA-DE01-7C03-FC36-95AFDEABF83B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Batrachopus |
status |
|
“Unnamed track n°1”
( Fig. 13 View FIG A-C)
Unnamed track n°1 – Lapparent & Montenat 1967: 30, fig. 18.
STATUS. — Specimens here identified as Batrachopus View in CoL isp.
EXAMINED MATERIAL. — ULB-04C14_I , ULB-04C17_A .
DESCRIPTION
The two tracks described by Lapparent & Montenat (1967) under the name “Unnamed track n°1” are poorly preserved. They are tetradactyl, small-sized, as long as wide, 3.3-(3.4)- 3.6 cm long and 2.8-(3.0)- 3.2 cm wide ( Fig. 13 View FIG A-C; Table 1 View TABLE ). Traces of digits are short. They show rounded phalangeal pads and their apices bear tiny marks of claws. A large plantar-like impression is present on ULB-04C14_I.
REMARKS
In their description of “Unnamed track n°1”, Lapparent & Montenat (1967) made a mistake by considering that both tracks are tridactyl. However, a thorough examination of the material reveals the presence of a poorly marked fourth digit. The morphology and the dimensions of “Unnamed track n°1” match with the ichnogenus Batrachopus .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.