Cytospora rhizophorae Kohlm. & E. Kohlm (1971)

Tian, Long yan, Xu, Jin zhu, Zhao, Dan yang, Qiu, Hua long, Yang, Hua & Qin, Chang sheng, 2020, New records of Celoporthe guangdongensis and Cytospora rhizophorae on mangrove apple in China, Biodiversity Data Journal 8, pp. 55251-55251 : 55251

publication ID

https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e55251

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/80E71A52-74B4-5FD5-A5AE-AE1E3A00CC3E

treatment provided by

Biodiversity Data Journal by Pensoft

scientific name

Cytospora rhizophorae Kohlm. & E. Kohlm (1971)
status

 

Cytospora rhizophorae Kohlm. & E. Kohlm (1971)

Materials

Type status: Other material. Occurrence: catalogNumber: TLY1-13; TLY2-42 ; recordedBy: C.S. Qin & L.Y. Tian; Taxon: scientificName: Cytosporarhizophorae; kingdom: Fungi; order: Diaporthales; family: Cytosporaceae; genus: Cytospora; Location: country: China; stateProvince: Guangdong; locality: Zhongshan City, Hengmen village, 113.5810°N, 22.4820°E ; verbatimElevation: 2.546 m; Identification: identifiedBy: L.Y. Tian; identificationReferences: (Kohlmeyer and Kohlmeyer 1971); Event: year: 2018; month: September; day: 26; habitat: on the twig of Sonneratiaapetala Buch.-Ham.; Record Level: language: en

Description

Pycnidial stromata ostiolated, immersed in bark, scattered, erumpent through the surface of bark, discoid, with favaginous multiple locules. Ectostromatic disc black, circular to ovoid, (300-)400-850(-950) µm in diam. Locule numerous, arranged irregularly with common walls, (100-)200-250(-350) µm in diam. Conidiophores hyaline, branched at base or not branched, thin walled, filamentous, (4.5-)6-14(-16) × 1-2 µm. Conidiogenous cells enteroblastic polyphialidic, (1.3-)2-4.5(-5.5) × 1-2.5 µm. Conidia hyaline, allantoid, smooth, aseptate, thin-walled, (3-)3.5-5(-6.1) × 1-1.5 μm (Fig. 4 View Figure 4 ).

Notes

Cytospora rhizophorae was initially introduced as mangrove fungi on Rhizophora species ( Kohlmeyer and Kohlmeyer 1971). Two isolates from the present study, together with MUCC302 and CBS 116861, formed a distinct clade (Fig. 5 View Figure 5 ). Additionally, the morphology observed in this study fit exactly with the primary description ( Kohlmeyer and Kohlmeyer 1971).