Thelcticopis serambiformis Strand, 1907
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5463.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6E261F38-7196-4C87-AE81-E09996D055F4 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11611814 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7D6E8786-FFD5-FFA2-FF02-F9D6D4FDBAD0 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Thelcticopis serambiformis Strand, 1907 |
status |
|
Thelcticopis serambiformis Strand, 1907 View in CoL
Figs 20 View FIGURES 20 , 27 View FIGURE 27
Thelcticopis serambiformis Strand, 1907: 561 View in CoL (♂ ♀). Strand 1909: 31, plate II, figs 33a–b (♂ ♀).
Type material. Syntype ♂ ♀, INDIA: Karnataka: Kodagu, Madikeri (= Merkara / Mercara ) [ca. 12°24’N, 75°44’E; 1073 m a.s.l.], date unknown, Veil leg. ( SMNS, material destroyed in World War II; not examined) but: right palp of syntype male in MNHN: 156 c[ollectio] St [rand]; examined GoogleMaps .
Diagnosis. Males of T. serambiformis can be distinguished from those of all other congeners examined by the shape of the tegular apophysis with two acuminate apices, and by the long RTA with a hook-shaped dorso-distal and a blunt ventro-distal apex (vs. tegular apophysis without such acuminate apices, RTA shorter or if similarly long with two branches or without such dorso-distal apex in all other species with males known) ( Figs 20A–B View FIGURES 20 vs. e.g., Figs 4E–F View FIGURES 4 , 5A–B View FIGURES 5 , 11C View FIGURES 11 , 12A–B View FIGURES 12 , 13A–B View FIGURES 13 , 14A–B View FIGURES 14 , 15A–B View FIGURES 15 , 17D–E View FIGURES 17 , 18A–B View FIGURES 18 , 21E–F View FIGURES 21 , 22C View FIGURES 22 , 23A–B View FIGURES 23 , 24A–B View FIGURES 24 ).
Description. Male [after Strand 1907: body length 13.8. Carapace 6.8 long, 5.5 wide. Opisthosoma 7.0 long, 4.5 wide. Leg measurements: I 24.3, II 23.1, III 19.6, IV 24.2].
Supplementary description. Palp ( Figs 20A – B View FIGURES 20 ): Cymbium with moderately distinct retrolateral bulge, dorsally with cymbial scopula in distal half ( Fig. 20B View FIGURES 20 ). Tibia shorter than cymbium, with massive, bifid, RTA arising distally from tibia. RTA margins with fringes of fine setae; vRTA with acute tooth internally, best seen in ventral view ( Fig. 20A View FIGURES 20 ). Tegulum with round proximad outgrowth proximo-prolaterally. Tegular apophysis arising in 17.30- to 18-o’clock-position from tegulum, distinctly bifurcated, disto-retrolateral tip curved in ventral view, proximo-prolateral tip with small bend apically (best seen in proximal view) ( Fig. 20B View FIGURES 20 ). Conductor arising at the base of the embolus, retrolaterad, similarly broad over its entire length, with two bulges apically. Embolus with a large, basally originating projection, arising at 10.30-o’clock-position from tegulum, simple, semicircular, tapering towards its tip, the latter proximad. Spermophor visible in ventral view proximo-prolaterally close to bulge.
Distribution. India (Karnataka) ( Strand 1907) ( Fig. 27 View FIGURE 27 ).
Remarks. Unfortunately, the type material in SMNS was destroyed and Strand (1907) did not illustrate the epigyne. The only remnant of the syntype series was to be found in MNHN (a right male palp) ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 20 ). If topotypic material is collected, its identity can be fully resolved.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Thelcticopis serambiformis Strand, 1907
Sankaran, Pradeep M., Sherwood, Danniella & Jäger, Peter 2024 |
Thelcticopis serambiformis
Strand, E. 1909: 31 |
Strand, E. 1907: 561 |