Thelcticopis bicornuta Pocock, 1901
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5463.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6E261F38-7196-4C87-AE81-E09996D055F4 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11611786 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7D6E8786-FFCA-FFBF-FF02-FF6BD6DDBF5D |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Thelcticopis bicornuta Pocock, 1901 |
status |
|
Thelcticopis bicornuta Pocock, 1901 View in CoL
Figs 4–5 View FIGURES 4 View FIGURES 5 , 26 View FIGURE 26
Thelcticopis bicornutus Pocock, 1901: 489 (♂).
Type material. Holotype ♂, INDIA: Nagaland: Naga Hills (formerly part of Assam of British India ) [ca. 25°59’N, 94°59’E; 1344 m a.s.l.], date unknown, collector unknown ( NHMUK 1897.6.24.27; examined). GoogleMaps
Diagnosis. Males of T. bicornuta are similar to those of T. severa in sharing a broad RTA with a narrowing distal part with 1–2 strong distal setae dorso-proximad and a bunch of strong distad setae arising medially to dorsally from the RTA, the cymbium with pronounced retrolateral bulge, the tegular apophysis arising at 4-o’ clock ventrally, and a short slightly curved embolus originating prolaterally from tegulum (cf. Figs 4D–F View FIGURES 4 , 5A–B View FIGURES 5 vs. Zhu et al. 2020: figs 2A–D). It can be distinguished from T. severa by having two distinctly curved, strong distal setae on ventral narrow part of RTA (vs. one seta in T. severa ), a right angle between the long and narrow ventral part and the broad dorsal part of the RTA (vs. obtuse angle in T. severa ), and four retromarginal cheliceral teeth in two groups of two, separated by a distinct gap (vs. five in a continuous line in T. severa ) (cf. Figs 4D–F View FIGURES 4 , 5A–B, D View FIGURES 5 vs. Zhu et al. 2020: figs 2A–D, G).
Supplementary description. Male (holotype; Figs 4A–C View FIGURES 4 , 5C–D View FIGURES 5 ). Colouration: brown [after Pocock 1901: nearly black, clothed with yellow-grey setae; dorsal opisthosoma posteriorly with dark, narrow, transverse stripes; venter dark at middle; thoracic striae evident]. Chelicerae with three promarginal and four retromarginal teeth, promarginal teeth increasing in size distally ( Fig. 5D View FIGURES 5 ). Body length 17.6. Carapace 9.0 long, 7.81 wide. Opisthosoma 8.6 long, 6.38 wide. Chelicerae 1.80 long. Eye sizes and interdistances ( Fig. 5C View FIGURES 5 ): AME 0.80, ALE 0.59, PME 0.36, PLE 0.56; AME–AME 0.65, AME–ALE 0.63, AME–PME 0.54, ALE–PLE 0.46, PME–PME 1.50, PME–PLE 1.42. Palp ( Figs 4D–F View FIGURES 4 , 5A–B View FIGURES 5 ; bulb slightly expanded, i.e., not in original resting position): cymbium with a pronounced retrolateral bulge, with cymbial scopula disto-dorsally ( Figs 4E–F View FIGURES 4 , 5A–B View FIGURES 5 ). The TA in T. bicornuta , distinctly sticking out in ventral view, might be an artefact since the TA is originated from a membrane and is, therefore, movable. Tibia short, with broad RTA having long, prolateral prong, with a short, triangular VDL ( Figs 4E–F View FIGURES 4 , 5A–B View FIGURES 5 ). Tegular apophysis arising from tegulum in 4-o’ clock position ventrally, with inwardly directed apex ( Figs 4E–F View FIGURES 4 , 5A–B View FIGURES 5 ). Conductor arising disto-laterally, curved retrolaterally, covering the apex of embolus ( Figs 4D–F View FIGURES 4 , 5A–B View FIGURES 5 ). Embolus short, disto-laterally originating, with tip extending to the distal part of conductor ( Figs 4E View FIGURES 4 , 5A View FIGURES 5 ).
Female. Unknown.
Distribution. India (Nagaland) ( Pocock 1901) ( Fig. 26 View FIGURE 26 ).
Remarks. The holotype jar contains a second palp, which does not belong to this species or even to this genus. It was already recognized by PJ, who identified it as belonging to ‘ Palystes sp. ’ and wrote a label (PJ and DS pers. obs.). It cannot be excluded that this species is a synonym of T. severa . For more discussion, see remarks of T. picta .
NHMUK |
Natural History Museum, London |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Thelcticopis bicornuta Pocock, 1901
Sankaran, Pradeep M., Sherwood, Danniella & Jäger, Peter 2024 |
Thelcticopis bicornutus
Pocock, R. I. 1901: 489 |