Vibilia, Milne-Edwards, 1830

Zeidler, Wolfgang, 2003, A review of the hyperiidean amphipod superfamily Vibilioidea Bowman and Gruner, 1973 (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Hyperiidea), Zootaxa 280 (1), pp. 1-104 : 11-12

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.280.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E738ACF1-5D43-423E-86CA-28D03CB077D4

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5087639

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7B1ABE13-AB07-FFD9-FEA6-F9FCFA87C141

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Vibilia
status

 

Key to the species of the genus Vibilia View in CoL

1. Posterior lateral corners of last urosomite more or less in line with distal margin ...... 2

­ Posterior lateral corners of last urosomite project slightly next to peduncle of U3 .... 14

2. Eyes absent ............................................................................ V. caeca Bulycheva, 1955 View in CoL

­ Eyes present................................................................................................................... 3

3. Eyes with ocelli in three rows ............................................. V. australis Stebbing, 1888 View in CoL

­ Eyes with ocelli in oval, or round, cluster..................................................................... 4

4 Pereopod 7; basis as long as, or longer than, remaining articles combined.................... .............................................................................. V. chuni Behning & Woltereck, 1912 View in CoL

­ Pereopod 7; basis considerably shorter than remaining articles combined................... 5

5. Uropod 2 reaching limit of U3, or marginally longer. Gnathopod 2; basis inflated (mature specimens), merus with fringe of robust setae on lateral and anterior margins. Antennae 1 bulbous ............................................................... V. robusta Bovallius, 1887 View in CoL

­ Uropod 2 distinctly shorter than U3. Gnathopod 2; basis with more or less parallel margins, merus with few setae. Antennae 1 often truncate.......................................... 6

6. Antennae 1 with rounded distal margin ........................................................................ 7

­ Antennae 1 with truncate or pointed distal margin ..................................................... 11

7. Gnathopod 1; posterodistal angle of propodus extended posteriorly to dactylus. Gnathopod 2; carpal process usually extends to dactylus. Pereopods 3 & 4 with thick articles, dactylus almost as long as propodus .............................. V. viatrix Bovallius, 1887 View in CoL

­ Gnathopod 1; posterior margin of propodus slopes gradually to base of dactylus. Gnathopod 2; carpal process extends to 0.5–0.8x length of propodus. Pereopods 3 & 4 with relatively thin articles, dactylus less than half­length of propodus....................... 8

8. Antennae 1; flagellum slightly narrower or equal in width to peduncle. Pereopod 7; basis with relatively narrow, posterodistal lobe overlapping ischium and half of merus. Telson pointed .................................................................... V. propinqua Stebbing, 1888 View in CoL

­ Antennae 1; flagellum slightly wider than peduncle. Pereopod 7; basis with relatively broad posterodistal lobe barely overlapping ischium. Telson rounded ....................... 9

9. Pereopods 5 & 6; dactylus longer than 0.3x length of propodus .................................... .............................................................................................. V. gibbosa Bovallius, 1887 View in CoL

­ Pereopods 5 & 6; dactylus short, about 0.2x length or less of propodus .................... 10

10. Pereopods 3 & 4; dactylus relatively short and stubby, length less than 0.2x propodus. Head with anterior margin rounded, or oblique, not projected above A1....................... .............................................................................................. V. jeangerardi Lucas, 1846

­ Pereopods 3 & 4; dactylus more slender, length more than 0.2x propodus. Head with anterior margin forming vertical, or rounded projection above base of A1 (more prominent in males) ........................................................ V. borealis Bate & Westwood, 1868 View in CoL

11 Pereopod 7; basis with small, sharp anterodistal lobe overlapping most of ischium...... ......................................................................... V. stebbingi Behning & Woltereck, 1912 View in CoL

­ Pereopod 7; basis with anterodistal corner not produced distally to overlap ischium 12

12. Pereopods 3 & 4 with relatively thin articles, dactylus distinctly shorter than half of propodus ............................................................................ V. antarctica Stebbing, 1888 View in CoL

­ Pereopods 3 & 4 with thick articles, dactylus distinctly longer than half of propodus... ..................................................................................................................................... 13

13. Pereopods 3 & 4 with very thick articles, especially merus and carpus. Gnathopod 1; posterodistal angle of propodus extended posteriorly to dactylus. Gnathopod 2; carpal process almost as long as propodus ....................................... V. viatrix Bovallius, 1887 View in CoL

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF