Tenedos figaro Jocqué & Baert, 2002
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5328.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:163EDB50-9804-4B1C-BCD8-28E580E633C8 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8243913 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/75340562-FFE6-FFD0-FF16-FE4B2D3DA889 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Tenedos figaro Jocqué & Baert, 2002 |
status |
|
Tenedos figaro Jocqué & Baert, 2002 View in CoL
Figs 19–20 View FIGURE 19 View FIGURE 20 ; 46 View FIGURE 46
Tenedos figaro Jocqué & Baert 2002: 121 View in CoL , fig. 1-2a–c, 3a–d, 4-5a–b, 16a–e, 24d. (Male holotype from Rio Palenque, Los Ríos, Pichincha, Ecuador, 220 m, not date, S. Sandoval leg., deposited in Pontificia Universidad Cátolica del Ecuador [PUCE], not examined). Paratypes: see extensive list in Jocqué & Baert (2002), not examined.
Remark. Although we did not examine the types, we did obtain a couple from the type locality. With this material, it was possible to determine the species and present a redescription.
Material examined. ECUADOR Pichincha, 47 km S of Santo Domingo, Río Palenque Station , 260 m, S Peck leg., 21-24.II.1976, 1 ♁ (FMNHINS 3479187); Tinalandia , 16 km SE of Santo Domingo , 680 m, S Peck leg., 15.IV.1975, 1 ♀ (FMNHINS 3821639) .
Diagnosis. Males of Tenedos figaro Jocqué & Baert, 2002 are similar to those of Tenedos quimbaya sp. n. by having a cymbium (Cy) almost as long as tibia + patella length, abundant modified setae on retrolateral side of the cymbium, and similar shape of prolateral laminar extension of the conductor (C) ( Figs 22A–D View FIGURE 22 ; 23A–B View FIGURE 23 ; 24A–F View FIGURE 24 ), are distinguished by the shape of median apophysis (MA): with a rounded anterior tip recurved, and medial furrow along of its extension; posterior branch of the retrolateral tibial apophysis (pRTA) longer than palpal tibia ( Fig. 20A–F View FIGURE 20 ). Females are diagnosed by their wide and oblique oriented copulatory ducts (SD), and oval median field plate (MFP), atrium (A) not delimited ( Fig. 20I View FIGURE 20 ).
Complementary description. Male (FMNHINS 3479187). Coloration ( Fig. 19A–B View FIGURE 19 ): carapace orangebrownish, dark brown in margins, with thin brown stripes extending from fovea to margins. Chelicerae with brown paturon, darker in the base, fangs reddish. Endites light brown, anteriorly white. Labium and sternum brown, more pigmented in margins. Legs: Coxae I–IV whitish-pale yellow. Femora I–IV light brown. Patellae I–IV light brown. Tibia I-II white, light brown at basal and distal regions. Metatarsi-tarsi I–IV light brown. Abdomen: dorsally dark gray with six white guanine spots organized as follows: two small, elongated spots, anteriorly positioned; two elongated spots larger than previous ones, medially positioned; two irregular spots smaller than medial ones, partially fused, posteriorly positioned. Laterally dark gray, with a wide, oblique band. Ventrally beige. Spinnerets pale brown. Palp: retrolateral process of cymbium (RPC) prominent, wide towards base; tegulum (T) sub-rounded at anterior region, elongated towards embolus base; subtegulum (St) very wide, conspicuous in ventral view; conductor (C) with prolateral region large and projected; appendix (ApC) long, sharp; embolus (E) very wide in the base, filiform towards apex; embolus base (EB) robust, basally projected, tending towards prolateral region; spermatic ducts (SD) thin; ventral tibial apophysis (VTA) large, quadrangular-shaped in ventral and retrolateral views; median apophysis (MA) large, with anterior rounded tip and a furrow in medial region; retrolateral tibial apophysis (RTA) with posterior branch (pRTA) longer than palpal tibia, anterior branch (aRTA) laminar, short, triangular ( Fig. 20A–F View FIGURE 20 ).
Female (FMNHINS 3479187). Coloration and abdominal pattern of spots as male with some differences: carapace uniformly brown with some incipient dark dots, legs with coxae pale brown, femora-tarsi light brown; abdominal spots are more rounded ( Fig. 19C–D View FIGURE 19 ). Epigyne: lateral borders (LB) very short, apically rounded, not delimiting atrium (A); median field plate (MFP) small; copulatory ducts (CD) long, wide, oblique oriented, describing approximately five tuns on spermathecae; spermathecae (S) large, rounded, posteriorly positioned; fertilization ducts (FD) almost as long as spermathecae ( Fig. 20I View FIGURE 20 ).
Natural history. Specimens were collected in leaf litter.
Distribution. Known from several localities in Pichincha, Ecuador ( Fig. 46 View FIGURE 46 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Tenedos figaro Jocqué & Baert, 2002
Martínez, Leonel, Brescovit, Antonio D. & Martínez, Carlos Prieto 2023 |
Tenedos figaro Jocqué & Baert 2002: 121
Jocque, R. & Baert, L. 2002: 121 |