Madagocerum bhemi, Oláh & Johanson, 2011
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.12612328 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12612305 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/747987AC-FF96-6416-5D40-4DF9FD01FCBE |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Madagocerum bhemi |
status |
sp. nov. |
Madagocerum bhemi sp. n.
( Figs 1–4 View Figs 1–4 )
Diagnosis –This species is most similar to M. idvigun sp. n. in having a short segment IX. It is distinguished from M. idvigum by the broader, blunt and divergent preanal appendages in dorsal view, not narrow, tapering and tangential; segment X is shorter than the preanal appendages, not longer; the coxopodites have no apicodorsal spiny protuberance; the harpagones are narrow, not broad; and the phallic apparatus is broad, not narrowing apically.
Description – Male (in alcohol). Body dark brown, except paler ventrally; cephalic and thoracic appendages light brown; forewing membrane light brown, without pattern (in alcohol).
Wings ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1–4 ): Forewing apex narrowly rounded; 5.0 mm; membrane light brown; termen slightly convex; basal lobe present covered by microtrichia; jugum absent. Forewing forks I, II, III, and V present; Sc running to R1, and R1 running to R2 before C, meeting at hypertrophied pterostigma; distally almost indiscernible; Cu2 apparently absent in forewings; postanal vein running closely to posterior wing margin.
Male genitalia ( Figs 2–4 View Figs 1–4 ): Abdominal segment IX fused annularly, short in lateral view, particularly at dorsal 1/3rd; venter 3 times longer than dorsum; anterior margin convex in lateral view, with lateral concavity conspicuous in dorsal view; posterior margins concave, with small, subtriangular apical lobe at dorsal margin of coxopodites; each antecosta and antecostal suture narrow on anterior margin of segment IX, forming pigmented marginal rim running evenly along anterior margin; acrotergite absent; surface of segment IX glabrous, spine row absent on posterior margins. Intersegmental depression between segments IX and X very deep, stepwise; segment X sunk to upper 1/3rd of segment IX, visible in lateral view; intersegmental depression covered by fused base of preanal appendages. Segment X broadly rod-like, directed straight posterad. Apicoventral setose lobes represented by setose apex of segment. Apicodorsal setose lobes reduced to central areas with scattered setae. Segment X body deeply cleft, with tangential lobes. Dorsal interlobular gap filled, as seen in dorsal view. Large, deeply bilobed preanal appendages dominating above phallic apparatus; fused basally; horizontal, posterad directed lobes fused to dorsum of segment IX; fused seam, representing borderline between segment IX and preanal appendages indiscernible; in lateral view, dorsal and ventral margins straight, producing regular, parallel-sided rods. Preanal appendages divergent in dorsal view, parallel-sided; rod-like. Coxopodites robust, dorsal margins rounded, convex; ventral margins concave, ending in small apicoventral corners. Harpagones slender, constricted at mid-length; capitate, with mesad turning apex with few, dark, short, conical spines. Phallic apparatus with broad, ventrally directed, short basal part; horizontal apical part long, straight. Small phallotremal sclerites almost indiscernible.
Material examined – Holotype: Male: “ Madagascar: Andohahela: 1800 m, i.1954 [Paulian]”.
Paratype: 1 male: same data as holotype .
Etymology: Bhemi, slender in Sanskrit, named after the slender harpagones in this species compared to in other species in the genus.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.