Ocadia Gray, 1870
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3647.4.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7FD5A595-EE31-4D08-BEA9-BB838054B0C8 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6152203 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/726CA836-1A1F-D039-FF4B-FA2F33AAFEB0 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ocadia Gray, 1870 |
status |
|
Type species. Ocadia sinensis (Gray, 1834) .
Included species. Ocadia sinensis (Gray, 1834) ; O. nipponica Hirayama et al., 2007 .
Revised diagnosis. Modified on the basis of Smith (1931), Bourret (1941), Ernst and Barbour (1989), Hirayama et al. (2007), and this study: medium to large–sized hingeless geoemydids with following combination of character states: hexagonal neural plates short–sided in front; posterior margin of the carapace unserrated; second and third vertebral scutes frequently showing nearly rectangular in shape, as long as wide; the entoplastron intersected by the humero–pectoral sulcus; the plastral buttresses moderately developed, extending to half way of the costal plates; median length of the gular shorter than the interhumeral sulcus and the gular often isolated from the entoplastron; enlarged upper and lower triturating surface decorated by the lingual ridges; the upper triturating surface with a denticulate median ridge; and the foramen palatinum posterius small.
Remarks. Recent molecular phylogenetic analyses have shown that the genus Ocadia is included in a clade with Chinemys spp. and Mauremys japonica and that these taxa form another more inclusive clade with the remaining living species of Mauremys ( Mauremys sensu lato, Honda et al. 2002; Barth et al. 2004; Feldman and Parham 2004; Spinks et al. 2004; Sasaki et al. 2006; Jiang et al. 2011). However, no synapomorphic morphological character states are known for the two clades (e.g., Honda et al. 2002; Hirayama et al. 2007). Actually, because Ocadia differs much from Chinemys and Mauremys in several skull and shell characters (e.g., McDowell 1964; Hirayama 1985; Gaffney and Meylan 1988; Yasukawa et al. 2001), we retain the genus Ocadia for disclosing its past species diversity from paleontological view in the present study.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |