Hydrobiosella Tillyard, 1924
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.24199/j.mmv.2010.67.01 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8064947 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/704FCC34-FFD2-E603-BEBD-FAE08CD9A86C |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Hydrobiosella Tillyard |
status |
|
Hydrobiosella Tillyard View in CoL View at ENA
Hydrobiosella Tillyard 1924: 288 View in CoL ; Mosely and Kimmins 1953:
387; Neboiss 1977: 45.
Type species. Hydrobiosella stenocerca Tillyard View in CoL by monotypy.
Generic descriptions are given by Tillyard (1924: 288), Mosely and Kimmins (1953: 387) and Neboiss (1977: 45).
Key to males of known Australian groups (or ungrouped species) of Hydrobiosella Tillyard View in CoL View at ENA
1. Phallus without pair of parameres ( Neboiss 1986, figs pp. 99; H. amblyopia View in CoL , 101; H. armata View in CoL , H. tasmanica View in CoL , 102; H. orba View in CoL , H. corinna View in CoL ) 2
– Phallus with pair of parameres ( Neboiss 1986, figs pp. 99; H. michaelseni View in CoL , H. waddama View in CoL , 101; H. letti View in CoL , 102; H.bispina View in CoL , 103; H. arcuata View in CoL ) 4
2. Preanal appendages present, usually small ( Neboiss 1977, figs 204–211; Neboiss 1986, figs p. 102 H. orba View in CoL , H. corinna View in CoL ; Neboiss 2003, figs 8a–h); Tas H. corinna View in CoL group
– Preanal appendages absent ( Neboiss 1986, figs pp. 99 H. amblyopia View in CoL , 101 H. armata View in CoL , H. tasmanica View in CoL ) 3
3. Phallus apically with downward projecting spine(s) ( Neboiss 1977, figs 216–221, 225, 226; Neboiss 1986, figs p. 101 H. armata View in CoL , H. tasmanica View in CoL ; Neboiss 2003, figs 10a–g, 11a–g, 12a–f); Tas H. tasmanica View in CoL group
– Phallus apically without downward projecting spine(s) ( Neboiss 1982, fig. 12; Neboiss 1986, figs p. 99 H. amblyopia View in CoL ); S-WA H. amblyopia View in CoL (ungrouped)
4. Inferior appendages with harpago with dark row of setae forming fringe along ventral margin (figs 2–4; Neboiss 1986, figs pp. 102 H.bispina View in CoL , 103 H. arcuata View in CoL ); E-Vic, E-NSW, E-Qld Hydrobiosella bispina View in CoL group
– Inferior appendages with harpago without dark row of setae forming fringe along ventral margin ( Neboiss 1986, figs pp. 99 H. michaelseni View in CoL , H. waddama View in CoL , 101 H. letti View in CoL ) 5
5. Parameres elongate and sinusoidal, attached ventrally to base of phallus ( Neboiss 1977, fig. 233; Neboiss 1986, figs p. 99 H. waddama View in CoL ; Neboiss 2003, figs 12g, h); Tas, SE Aust. H. waddama View in CoL (group — only one species described)
– Parameres not elongate and sinusoidal, not attached ventrally to base of phallus ( Neboiss 1982, figs 9, 10; Neboiss 1986, figs pp. 99 H. michaelseni View in CoL , 101 H. letti View in CoL ) 6
6. Parameres curved strongly and crossed ( Neboiss 1982, figs 9, 10; Neboiss 1986, figs p. 99 H. michaelseni View in CoL ); S-WA H. michaelseni View in CoL (ungrouped)
– Parameres not curved strongly and crossed ( Neboiss 1986, figs p. 101 H. letti View in CoL ); CE-NSW H. letti View in CoL (ungrouped)
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Hydrobiosella Tillyard
Cartwright, David I. 2010 |
Hydrobiosella
Tillyard, R. J. 1924: 288 |