Lamium ponticum Miller
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.511.1.6 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5486542 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/704A87E5-FFBB-FF99-FF71-226E7D07FED1 |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Lamium ponticum Miller |
status |
|
Lamium ponticum Miller View in CoL
Type :— TURKEY. A8 RIZE. in Ponto Lazico maritimo circa Rhize, vi 1866, Balansa 892 (holotype G!) .
The corolla of Lamium ponticum is quite different from L. moschatum subsp. moschatum and L. moschatum subsp. micranthum . The lateral lobes of the lower lip of the corolla of L. ponticum are filiform, while L. moschatum subsp. micranthum has oblong and clearly thicker lobes. There is a clear pink dot just below lateral lobes of lower lip of corolla in L. ponticum , while the corolla of L. moschatum subsp. micranthum is completely white, with no pink dot on the corolla. Pollen grains are orange color in L. ponticum , while pollen grains of L. moschatum subsp. micranthum are yellow. The inflorescence is pilose hairy in L. ponticum , while the inflorescence is glabrous or subglabrous in L. moschatum subsp. micranthum . Unpublished molecular results (Celep et al. in prep.) also shows that L. moschatum and L. ponticum are different species. Therefore, based on all evidence we resurrected L. ponticum in this paper.
G |
Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.