Dicrostonyx Gloger 1841

Wilson, Don E. & Reeder, DeeAnn, 2005, Order Rodentia - Family Cricetidae, Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference (3 rd Edition), Volume 2, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 955-1189 : 970

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7316535

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11356947

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7043235F-5AE8-B166-862A-7822433D93E0

treatment provided by

Guido

scientific name

Dicrostonyx Gloger 1841
status

 

Dicrostonyx Gloger 1841 View in CoL

Dicrostonyx Gloger 1841 View in CoL , Gemein. Hand.-Hilfsbuch. Nat., Vol. 1: 97.

Type Species: Mus hudsonius Pallas 1778

Species and subspecies: 8 species:

Species Dicrostonyx groenlandicus (Traill 1823)

Species Dicrostonyx hudsonius (Pallas 1778)

Species Dicrostonyx nelsoni Merriam 1900

Species Dicrostonyx nunatakensis Youngman 1967

Species Dicrostonyx richardsoni Merriam 1900

Species Dicrostonyx torquatus (Pallas 1778)

Species Dicrostonyx unalascensis Merriam 1900

Species Dicrostonyx vinogradovi Ognev 1948

Discussion: Borioikon Poliakov, 1881 ; Cuniculus Wagler, 1830 [not of Brisson, 1762, Gronovius, 1763, or Mayer, 1790]; Misothermus Hensel, 1855 ; Tylonyx Schulze, 1897 .

Dicrostonychini. Dicrostonyx was initially grouped with other lemmings following Miller’s (1896) classic Lemmi-Microti division (e.g., Ellerman, 1941; Hinton, 1926; Ognev, 1963; Simpson, 1945). A large and diverse information base, however, requires its tribal separation from the true lemmings (Lemmini) and suggests that the cladistic origin of Dicrostonyx dates to the earliest radiation of arvicolines ( Carleton, 1981; Chaline and Graf, 1988; Conroy and Cook, 1999; Gromov and Polyakov, 1977; Hinton, 1926 a; Hooper and Hart, 1962; Kretzoi, 1969; Mezhzherin et al., 1995; Modi, 1987, 1996). Various aspects of taxonomy, karyology, distribution, and ecology are summarized by Stenseth and Ims (1993). Pliocene-Pleistocene changes in molar complexity traced by Agadzhanyan (1986); Quaternary fossils place the generic occurrence in North America far to the south of its present distribution, e.g., in Wyoming, Iowa, and Maryland ( Graham and Lundelius, 1994; Mead and Mead, 1989).

The simple viewpoint of a single circumpolar species, D. torquatus , as advocated by Ognev (1963) and Rausch (1953, 1963), was unsettled by karyological and breeding studies in recent decades that implied a geographically partitioned superspecies complex ( Chernyavskii and Kozlovskii, 1980; Gileva, 1983; Krohne, 1982; Rausch, 1977; Rausch and Rausch, 1972). The occurrence of collared lemmings in quite different tundra biotopes (e.g., see Youngman, 1975) alone disputed the existence of a single species within North America. Later authorities either have listed the North American karyotypic variants as species ( Baker et al., 2003 b; Corbet and Hill, 1991; Honacki et al., 1982; Jones et al., 1986, 1997; Musser and Carleton, 1993); or continued to recognize most as subspecies of D. groenlandicus , retaining only D. exsul on St. Lawrence Isl and D. hudsonius on the Ungava Peninsula as separate ( Hall, 1981); or modified Hall’s treatment to yield two New World species, D. hudsonius and D. groenlandicus , the latter embracing exsul and vinogradovi on Wrangel Isl ( Jarrell and Fredga, 1993).

The kinds of studies needed to settle this indecision emerged in the 1990 s ( Borowik and Engstrom, 1993; Eger, 1995; Ehrich et al., 2000; Engstrom et al., 1993; Fedorov et al., 1999 a; Van Wynsberghe and Engstrom, 1992). While the framework for taxonomic understanding is thus much improved, straightforward declarations of synonymy of studied taxa would help much to signal systematic conclusions. As indicated in 1993, the specific recognition of D. groenlandicus , D. hudsonius , D. richardsoni , and D. unalascensis is defensible on morphological grounds, and such an interpretation is generally consistent with these recent research contributions. The distinctiveness of other North American taxa, namely kilangmiutak and rubricatus , has not been sustained by this body of research, which points to their synonymy under D. groenlandicus ( Eger, 1995; Ehrich et al., 2000). We continue to provisionally retain as species D. nelsoni and D. nunatakensis (specimens of latter not seen), examples of which have yet to be critically addressed in the on-going systematic review of Dicrostonyx ; nor is the evidence for merging D. vinogradovi as another form of D. groenlandicus , as advanced by Jarrell and Fredga (1993), sufficiently convincing to date .

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Chordata

Class

Mammalia

Order

Rodentia

Family

Cricetidae

SubFamily

Arvicolinae

Loc

Dicrostonyx Gloger 1841

Wilson, Don E. & Reeder, DeeAnn 2005
2005
Loc

Dicrostonyx

Gloger 1841: 97
1841
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF