Lernaeenicus hemirhamphi

Raja, Kuzhanthaivel, Saravanakumar, Ayyapan, Gopalakrishnan, Ayyaru, Vijayakumar, Ramalingam, Hwang, Ui Wook & Maran, Balu Alagar Venmathi, 2016, The genus Lernaeenicus Lesueur (Copepoda, Siphonostomatoida, Pennellidae) in India: a checklist with notes on its taxonomy and ecology, Zootaxa 4174 (1), pp. 192-211 : 200

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4174.1.14

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7C7EC9C7-D1FC-41E4-958D-993F42A3CA3F

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5668574

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7034D713-FFA5-FF9C-499E-FBEE52B1B8E6

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Lernaeenicus hemirhamphi
status

 

Lernaeenicus hemirhamphi

A total of 13,756 individuals of Hemiramphus far were examined, of which 1,800 were infested. Prevalence was almost similar at both stations, i.e. Nagapattinam (13.2%) ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 A) and Parangipettai (12.5%) ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 C). Higher prevalence was observed during postmonsoon (2011) at Nagapattinam whereas it was lower during premonsoon (2013) at Parangipettai. The overall mean intensity was 1.6 and 1.5 at Nagapattinam ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 B) and Parangipettai ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 D), respectively (Table 1).

Another host, Hemiramphus lutkei , was also examined for L. hemirhamphi ; 1,082 out of 11,532 individuals were infested by the pennellid. The overall percentage of prevalence was 9.9% at Nagapattinam and 9.5% at Parangipettai. Prevalence (18.4%) was high during postmonsoon (2011) at Nagapattinam and low (3.5%) during premonsoon (2013) at Nagapattinam. The overall mean intensity was 1.4 at both stations. Seasonal high mean intensity of 1.8 was noted during postmonsoon (2011) at Nagapattinam and but was lower (1.2) during premonsoon (2012) at Parangipettai.

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF