Thripophaga berlepschi Hellmayr, 1905

LECROY, MARY & SLOSS, RICHARD, 2000, Type Specimens Of Birds In The American Museum Of Natural History. Part 3. Passeriformes: Eurylaimidae, Dendrocolaptidae, Furnariidae, Formicariidae, Conopophagidae, And Rhinocryptidae, Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 2000 (257), pp. 1-88 : 26-28

Thripophaga berlepschi Hellmayr Thripophaga berlepschi Hellmayr, 1905c: 503 (“Leimabamba”, N. Peru, 10,000 ft. elev.). Now Thripophaga berlepschi Hellmayr, 1905 . See Sibley and Monroe, 1990: 403, and Ridgely and Tudor, 1994: 117. HOLOTYPE: AMNH 523895, adult male, collected at Leimebamba, 06°41′S, 77°47′W, 10,000 ft, upper Río Utucubamba, Amazonas, Peru, on 13 July 1894, by Oscar T. Baron. From the Rothschild Collection. COMMENTS: Collar et al. (1992: 622), Ridgely and Tudor (1994: 117), and others have suggested that this species may be more closely related to Cranioleuca . Vaurie (1980: 202) placed it in Phacellodomus . The species that Vaurie (1980: 179, 196)

called Thripophaga berlepschi = Asthenes berlepschi of other authors.

Anabates rufifrons Wied

Anabates rufifrons Wied, 1821: 177 (Rio Ressaque).

Now Phacellodomus rufifrons rufifrons (Wied, 1821) . See

Vaurie, 1980: 198–199, Fjeldså and Krabbe, 1990: 382,

and Sick, 1997: 572–573.

SYNTYPES: AMNH 5210, male, and 5211, female, collected on the Ribeirão da Ressaca, 14°51′S, 41°24′W, Bahia, Brazil, by Maximilian, Prince of Wied. From the Maximilian Collection.

COMMENTS: In the AMNH catalog and in Allen (1889b: 245), AMNH 5210 is listed as the male type and AMNH 5211 as the female. When the type labels were attached to these specimens, AMNH 5210 was incorrectly given the number 5212, a Verreaux Collection specimen.

In his original description, Wied did not indicate the sex of the specimen(s) he was describing; however, in his “Beiträge” (Wied, 1831: 1191), he listed both male and female. Allen (1889b: 245) noted that “Wied’s name rufifrons has two years’ priority over frontalis of Lichtenstein, and should be adopted as the name of the species.”

Phacellodomus striaticeps griseipectus Chapman

Phacellodomus striaticeps griseipectus Chapman, 1919a: 258 (Tica-Tica, 11,500 ft., near Cuzco, Peru).

Now Phacellodomus striaticeps griseipectus Chapman, 1919 . See Fjeldså and Krabbe, 1990: 382, and Ridgely and Tudor, 1994: 120.

HOLOTYPE: AMNH 145210 , adult male, collected at Ttica-Ttica , 11,500 ft, ca. 13°30′S, 72°03′W, ca. 5 km NW of Cuzco, Cuzco, Peru, on 2 July 1916, by Frank M. Chapman.

Anabates erythrophthalmus Wied Anabates erythrophthalmus Wied, 1821: 147 (Flusse Catolé) .

Now Phacellodomus erythrophthalmus erythrophthalmus

(Wied, 1821). See Ridgely and Tudor, 1994: 123, and

Sick, 1997: 573.

SYNTYPES: AMNH 6805, female, and 6810, male, collected on the Rio Catolé Grande, 15°22′S, 40°06′W, a left bank tributary of the middle Rio Pardo, Bahia, Brazil, by Maximilian, Prince of Wied. From the Maximilian Collection.

COMMENTS: The original label covered both specimens, and they are not sexed in the AMNH catalog.

Ridgely and Tudor (1994: 123) suggested that because this species differs markedly from the other species included in Phacellodomus , the genus Drioctistes Ridgway might be accepted (cf. Cory and

Hellmayr, 1925: 156). Phacellodomus ruber rubicula Cherrie Phacellodomus ruber rubicula Cherrie, 1916a: 186 (San Lorenzo River, Matto Grosso).

Now Phacellodomus ruber (Vieillot, 1817) . See Cory and Hellmayr, 1925: 163, Vaurie, 1980: 201–202, and Ridgely and Tudor, 1994: 120.

HOLOTYPE: AMNH 127731 , adult male, collected on the Rio São Lourenço (between its mouth and the mouth of the Cuiabá River), ca. 17°53′S, 57°27′W, Mato Grosso, Brazil, on 2 January 1914, by George K. Cherrie (no. 17633) on the Roosevelt – Rondon South American Expedition.

Roraimia adusta duidae Chapman Roraimia adusta duidae Chapman, 1939: 9 (alt. 5000 ft.,

Mt. Duida, Venezuela).

Now Roraimia adusta duidae Chapman, 1939 . See Meyer de Schauensee and Phelps, 1978: 194, and Rudge and

Raikow, 1992.

HOLOTYPE: AMNH 271140 , adult male, collected at Cumbre #2, Cabeceras del Valle (= Camp #2, Valley Head Camp ), 5000 ft, ca. 03°21′N, 65°35′W, Cerro Duida, Amazonas, Venezuela, on 13 January 1929, by the Olalla brothers.

COMMENTS: Meyer de Schauensee and Phelps (1978: 194) placed the species in the genus Premnoplex and recognized the subspecies duidae. Vaurie (1980: 227, 234) placed it in the genus Margarornis and did not recognize this subspecies. Rudge and Raikow ( 1992) retained the genus Roraimia , based on hindlimb musculature, as did Ridgely and Tudor (1994: 133).

Margarornis rubiginosus boultoni Griscom Margarornis rubiginosus boultoni Griscom, 1924a: 4

(Cerro Flores, 6000 ft., eastern Chiriqui, Panama).

Now Margarornis rubiginosus boultoni Griscom, 1924 .

See Wetmore, 1972: 74.

HOLOTYPE: AMNH 182771 , adult female, collect- ed at Cerro Flores , 5500 ft (on field label), eastern Chiriquí, Panama, on 18 March 1924, by Ludlow Griscom and J. Manson Valentine.

COMMENTS: Griscom (1924b) showed Cerro Santiago (08°34′N, 81°42′W; Times Atlas) on the map accompanying the popular account of his trip and thought that Cerro Flores was perhaps 10 mi east of that peak .

Margarornis guttata Lawrence

Margarornis guttata Lawrence, 1865a: 128 (Quito, Ecuador).

Now Premnornis guttuligera (Sclater, 1864) . See Cory and Hellmayr 1925: 173, Fjeldså and Krabbe, 1990: 385, Sibley and Monroe, 1990: 405, and Ridgely and

Tudor, 1994: 131.

HOLOTYPE: AMNH 43224 , sex?, collected in “Quito”, Ecuador. Received from “C.R.B.” From the George N. Lawrence Collection.

COMMENTS: The description was issued in May 1865.

Vaurie (1980: 227, 235–236) listed this species under Margarornis guttuliger .