Asthenes humilis cajamarcae Zimmer, 1936

LECROY, MARY & SLOSS, RICHARD, 2000, Type Specimens Of Birds In The American Museum Of Natural History. Part 3. Passeriformes: Eurylaimidae, Dendrocolaptidae, Furnariidae, Formicariidae, Conopophagidae, And Rhinocryptidae, Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 2000 (257), pp. 1-88 : 26

publication ID	https://doi.org/ 10.1206/0003-0090(2000)257<0001:TSOBIT>2.0.CO;2
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6F618792-FFAC-FD44-2981-D612FC56FAF8
treatment provided by	Felipe
scientific name	Asthenes humilis cajamarcae Zimmer
status

Treatment

Asthenes humilis cajamarcae Zimmer View in CoL

Asthenes humilis cajamarcae Zimmer, 1936a: 16 View in CoL (Cajamarca, Peru; altitude 10,000 feet).

Now Asthenes humilis cajamarcae Zimmer, 1936 View in CoL . See Fjeldså and Krabbe, 1990: 378. HOLOTYPE: AMNH 99121 , adult male, collected at Cajamarca, 10,000 ft, 07°10′S, 78°31′W, Cajamarca, Peru, on 27 June 1895, by Oscar T. Baron. GoogleMaps

COMMENTS: Vaurie (1980: 175, 181) placed this species in Thripophaga .

Siptornis flammulata quindiana Chapman Siptornis flammulata quindiana Chapman, 1915a: 643 (Páramo of Santa Isabel, 12,500 ft., Cen. Andes, Colombia).

Now Asthenes flammulata quindiana (Chapman, 1915) . See Vuilleumier, 1968, Fjeldså and Krabbe, 1990: 380, and Ridgely and Tudor, 1994: 114.

HOLOTYPE: AMNH 112065 , adult male, collected on the Páramo de Santa Isabel , 12,500 ft, ca. 04°47′N, 75°26′W,? Risaralda, Central Andes, Colombia, on 20 September 1911, by Arthur A. Allen and Leo E. Miller (no. 513). GoogleMaps

COMMENTS: Vaurie (1980: 174) placed this species in Thripophaga .

Anabates macrourus Wied

Anabates macrourus Wied, 1821: 147 (Flusse Catolé) .

Now Thripophaga macroura (Wied, 1821) . See Vaurie,

1980: 185, Ridgely and Tudor, 1994: 116, and Sick,

1997: 572.

HOLOTYPE: AMNH 6804 , male, collected on the Rio Catolé Grande , 15°22′S, 40°06′W, Bahia, Brazil, by Maximilian, Prince of Wied. From the Maximilian Collection. GoogleMaps

COMMENTS: The sex is not noted on the original label, nor is it given in the original description, but Wied (1831: 1185) stated that he did not obtain a female, and he again described the male. This specimen was originally marked “female” on the printed label, but this has been placed in brackets and “male” added in pencil.

Allen (1889b: 245) noted that “Although Wied’s name macrourus has two years’ priority over [ Sphenura ] striolata of Lichtenstein, Wied abandoned his own name in favor of the latter (cf. Beitrage, III, p. 1186).”