Tethlimmena Bates, 1872
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5060.3.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0E9C6A17-710A-4DF7-A23F-69FAA1113F4D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5636479 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6C7F3F1B-6C68-FF8B-DEC6-FD03FC66F474 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Tethlimmena Bates, 1872 |
status |
|
Tethlimmena Bates, 1872 View in CoL
Tethlimmena Bates, 1872: 185 View in CoL ; Gemminger, 1872: 2895 (cat.); Bates, 1880: 45; Aurivillius, 1912: 287 (cat.); Monné, 1993: 57 (cat.); 2005: 261 (cat.); 2012: 26; 2021: 623 (cat.).
Remarks. Bates (1872) included Tethlimmena in Eroschemini , and it has been kept in this tribe by many authors (e.g. Aurivillius 1912, Maes 1998, Hovore 2006, Swift et al. 2010, Maes et al. 2010, Bezark 2021b). Tethlimmena Bates, 1872 appears in Monné (2021) and Tavakilian & Chevillotte (2021) in Oxycoleini . According to Martins & Galileo (2003) (translated): “In 1911, Gounelle described Tethlimmena gahani . Tethlimmena was allocated in the tribe Eroschemini , constituted by species unique to Australia and similar to Lycidae ; he based his description in a female with abdominal ventrites modified [ Figs 16, 19, 24 View FIGURES 15–24. 15–20 , 31 View FIGURES 25–31 , 33, 37 View FIGURES 32–37. 32–35 ], therefore, different from females of Eroschemini (or of Molorchini ), which have the abdominal ventrites normal [ Figs. 6–7 View FIGURES 5–7. 5 ]. Thus, the original allocation of Tethlimmena was wrong.” However, it was Bates (1872) who included Tethlimmena in Eroschemini , although the abdominal ventrites of the female of the type-species, T. aliena Bates, 1872 , are modified. Unfortunately, Martins & Galileo (2003) were not very clear about the inclusion of Tethlimmena in Oxycoleini . Júlio (1997) considered Tethlimmena as belonging to Eroschemini (translated): “In this work we described two new species from Brazil, propose the synonymy between O. latipennis ( Zajciw, 1964) and Tethlimmena gahani var. tristis Melzer, 1933 and two new combinations, O. tristis ( Melzer, 1933) (from Tethlimmena ) and O. gahani ( Gounelle, 1911) (from Tethlimmena ) thus, the Eroschemini being restricted to Asia, Australia and Central America.” We think that Tethlimmena must be allocated to Oxycoleini , and that the transference, poorly established in Martins & Galileo (2003) is correct.
Tethlimmena differs from Oxycoleus by the elytra without humeral carina, not dehiscent, at least slightly widened toward the apex, which is rounded. The antennomeres in males ( Figs 4–5 View FIGURES 1–4. 1 View FIGURES 5–7. 5 ) and females of the type species are distinctly widened toward the apex and distinctly flattened. However, in males of T. basalis Gahan, 1895 the antennomeres are distinctly less expanded toward the apex. This may suggest they belong to different genera. Unfortunately, we have no specimens of T. basalis and have only a single male of T. aliena Bates, 1872 . Therefore, further studies are needed to confirm or not that they belong to the same genus.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Tethlimmena Bates, 1872
Nascimento, Francisco Eriberto De L. & Santos-Silva, Antonio 2021 |
Tethlimmena
Monne, M. A. 1993: 57 |
Aurivillius, C. 1912: 287 |
Bates, H. W. 1880: 45 |