Tethlimmena Bates, 1872

Nascimento, Francisco Eriberto De L. & Santos-Silva, Antonio, 2021, The interesting and complex tribe Oxycoleini (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae): a new genus, new species, and taxonomic notes, Zootaxa 5060 (3), pp. 353-370 : 354

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5060.3.3

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0E9C6A17-710A-4DF7-A23F-69FAA1113F4D

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5636479

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6C7F3F1B-6C68-FF8B-DEC6-FD03FC66F474

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Tethlimmena Bates, 1872
status

 

Tethlimmena Bates, 1872 View in CoL

Tethlimmena Bates, 1872: 185 View in CoL ; Gemminger, 1872: 2895 (cat.); Bates, 1880: 45; Aurivillius, 1912: 287 (cat.); Monné, 1993: 57 (cat.); 2005: 261 (cat.); 2012: 26; 2021: 623 (cat.).

Remarks. Bates (1872) included Tethlimmena in Eroschemini , and it has been kept in this tribe by many authors (e.g. Aurivillius 1912, Maes 1998, Hovore 2006, Swift et al. 2010, Maes et al. 2010, Bezark 2021b). Tethlimmena Bates, 1872 appears in Monné (2021) and Tavakilian & Chevillotte (2021) in Oxycoleini . According to Martins & Galileo (2003) (translated): “In 1911, Gounelle described Tethlimmena gahani . Tethlimmena was allocated in the tribe Eroschemini , constituted by species unique to Australia and similar to Lycidae ; he based his description in a female with abdominal ventrites modified [ Figs 16, 19, 24 View FIGURES 15–24. 15–20 , 31 View FIGURES 25–31 , 33, 37 View FIGURES 32–37. 32–35 ], therefore, different from females of Eroschemini (or of Molorchini ), which have the abdominal ventrites normal [ Figs. 6–7 View FIGURES 5–7. 5 ]. Thus, the original allocation of Tethlimmena was wrong.” However, it was Bates (1872) who included Tethlimmena in Eroschemini , although the abdominal ventrites of the female of the type-species, T. aliena Bates, 1872 , are modified. Unfortunately, Martins & Galileo (2003) were not very clear about the inclusion of Tethlimmena in Oxycoleini . Júlio (1997) considered Tethlimmena as belonging to Eroschemini (translated): “In this work we described two new species from Brazil, propose the synonymy between O. latipennis ( Zajciw, 1964) and Tethlimmena gahani var. tristis Melzer, 1933 and two new combinations, O. tristis ( Melzer, 1933) (from Tethlimmena ) and O. gahani ( Gounelle, 1911) (from Tethlimmena ) thus, the Eroschemini being restricted to Asia, Australia and Central America.” We think that Tethlimmena must be allocated to Oxycoleini , and that the transference, poorly established in Martins & Galileo (2003) is correct.

Tethlimmena differs from Oxycoleus by the elytra without humeral carina, not dehiscent, at least slightly widened toward the apex, which is rounded. The antennomeres in males ( Figs 4–5 View FIGURES 1–4. 1 View FIGURES 5–7. 5 ) and females of the type species are distinctly widened toward the apex and distinctly flattened. However, in males of T. basalis Gahan, 1895 the antennomeres are distinctly less expanded toward the apex. This may suggest they belong to different genera. Unfortunately, we have no specimens of T. basalis and have only a single male of T. aliena Bates, 1872 . Therefore, further studies are needed to confirm or not that they belong to the same genus.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Cerambycidae

Loc

Tethlimmena Bates, 1872

Nascimento, Francisco Eriberto De L. & Santos-Silva, Antonio 2021
2021
Loc

Tethlimmena

Monne, M. A. 1993: 57
Aurivillius, C. 1912: 287
Bates, H. W. 1880: 45
1880
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF