Panopsis rubescens (Pohl) Rusby
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/adansonia2022v44a26 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6C71879E-FE8A-FB76-FC4F-5495FF3AFE96 |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Panopsis rubescens (Pohl) Rusby |
| status |
|
[1420] Panopsis rubescens (Pohl) Rusby View in CoL
Mem.Torrey Bot. Club 6 (1): 116 (Rusby 1896). — Andriapetalum rubescens Pohl, Pl. Bras. Icon. Descr. View in CoL 1 (4): 114 [May-Dec. 1828] (Pohl 1828).
Andriapetalum rubescens var. acuminatum Meisn., Prodr. View in CoL [A. P. de Candolle] 14 (1): 346 [mid Oct. 1856] (Meisner 1856), “ Andripetalum ”. — Panopsis acuminata (Meisn.) J.F.Macbr., Publ. Field Mus. Nat. Hist., Bot. Ser. View in CoL 11 (2): 66 (Macbride 1931).
Andriapetalum sprucei Meisn., Prodr. View in CoL [A. P. de Candolle] 14 (1): 347 [mid Oct. 1856] (Meisner 1856). — Panopsis rubescens var. sprucei (Meisn.) Sleumer, Bot. Jahrb. Syst. View in CoL 76 (2): 180 [Jan. 1954] (Sleumer 1954).
Roupala yauaperyensis Barb.Rodr. View in CoL , Vellosia , ed. 2, 1: 66 (Barbosa Rodrigues 1891).
Panopsis sprucei Rusby, Mem. Torrey Bot. View in CoL Club 6 (1): 116 (Rusby 1896), nom. illeg. superfl.
Panopsis rubescens var. simulans J.F.Macbr., Publ. Field Mus. Nat. Hist., Bot. Ser. View in CoL 11 (2): 67 (Macbride 1931).
Panopsis cuaensis Steyerm., Ann. View in CoL Missouri Bot. Gard. 74 (3): 612 (Steyermark 1987).
NOTES. — Rusby (1896: 116) did not cite Andriapetalum sprucei Meisn. However , he ascribed the binomial “ Panopsis sprucei ” to “Meissn. Ms. in Herb. Kew”, while stating that the original material (Bang 1686 [NY, 01364973]) is “the same as Spruce’s no. 1817”. Spruce 1817 is the type of Andriapetalum sprucei , and the K specimens (K000634341, K000634342]) bear the handwritten annotation (not in Meissner's hand) “ Andripetalum Sprucei Meisn. ”, which is presumably what Rusby was referring to. As Meisner did not use Panopsis sprucei , the authorship of this name is “Rusby”, not “Meisn. ex Rusby”. Furthermore, P. sprucei is an illegitimate superfluous name because although independent from A. sprucei , the type of the latter is cited in the protologue.
HERBARIUM DATA (FG). — 4 collections at CAY. Sel. exs.: S.A. Mori et al. 20968.
INVENTORY DATA (FG). — 8 trees in 2 plots; Fmax <1 %; dbhinv = 54.1 cm.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Panopsis rubescens (Pohl) Rusby
| Molino, Jean-François, Sabatier, Daniel, Grenand, Pierre, Engel, Julien, Frame, Dawn, Delprete, Piero G., Fleury, Marie, Odonne, Guillaume, Davy, Damien, Lucas, Eve J. & Martin, Claire A. 2022 |
Panopsis cuaensis
| Steyerm. 1987: 612 |
Panopsis acuminata (Meisn.) J.F.Macbr., Publ. Field Mus. Nat. Hist., Bot. Ser.
| J. F. Macbr. 1931: 66 |
Panopsis rubescens var. simulans J.F.Macbr., Publ. Field Mus. Nat. Hist., Bot. Ser.
| J. F. Macbr. 1931: 67 |
Panopsis sprucei
| Rusby 1896: 116 |