Pachygrapsus planifrons De Man, 1888
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.1015.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:67DBD7AA-FA11-4F32-811B-0A9EFF4C668F |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10532475 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6C3D8794-ED66-FFDC-6C1C-FC3DFE7CF9C8 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Pachygrapsus planifrons De Man, 1888 |
status |
|
Pachygrapsus planifrons De Man, 1888 View in CoL ( Figures 10a–f View FIGURE 10 , 14d View FIGURE 14 , 15d View FIGURE 15 )
Pachygrapsus planifrons De Man, 1888: 368 View in CoL , pl. 16, fig. 2 [type locality: Noordwachter Island = Jaga Utara, Java Sea off Java, Indonesia, 05°12'S, 106°27'E]. — De Man, 1908: 218 (remarks on P. longipes View in CoL status). — Tesch, 1918: 77 ( Indonesia; synonymy). — Ward, 1934: 25 (Christmas I.). — Tweedie, 1936: 45 (Christmas I.); 1950b: 130 (CocosKeeling Is.). — Holthuis, 1953: 31 ( Kiribati; Tuamotu Archip.). —Edmonson, 1959: 173, fig. 10b (Hawaiian Is.; synonymy). — Garth, 1965: 30, fig. 15–16 ( Clipperton). — Chace, 1966: 644, fig. 11f (Hawaiian Is.; synonymy). — Chen, 1980: 139: fig. 22, pl. IV3 (Paracel Is.). — Dai & Yang, 1991: 510, fig. 261 (Hainan). — Ng & Davie, 2002: 379 ( Thailand). — Paulay et al., 2003: 495 ( Guam). — Komai et al., 2004: 34 ( Japan). — Yeo et al., 2004: 88 (Anambas Is., South China Sea).
Pachygrapsus longipes Rathbun, 1893: 247 (Hawaiian Is.) View in CoL . — Rathbun, 1906: 840 (Hawaiian Is.); 1907: 30 (Fakarava Atoll, Tuamotu Archip.); 1911: 242 ( Seychelles).
Pachygrapsus laevis Borradaile, 1900: 592 View in CoL , pl. 42, fig. 7 ( Tuvalu; new synonymy see remarks). — Tesch, 1918: 76 (Key).
Type material
Presumably lost. According to C. H. Fransen (pers. comm.) the syntypes were probably deposited at Göttingen ( ZMG), but are not found there (G. Tröster, pers. comm.), nor are they part of the material that was transferred from Göttingen to Frankfurt ( SMF). The Göttingen collection was in poor condition before being transferred to Frankfurt, and a number of types of other species also appear to have been lost (M. Türkay, pers. comm.).
Material Examined
Mariana Is. Guam: Bile Bay , supratidal/intertidal, among rocks, common, coll. G. Paulay, 29 March 1998, 2 M 5.1 x 6.3, 5.6 x 6.8 mm ( UF 129 ) .
Caroline Is. Yap: Maap I., high intertidal, under rocks and plants debris, coll. G. Paulay, 1 April 2000, 1 ov. F 5.2 x 6.7 mm ( UF 3849 ; Photo GP805 ) .
Tuvalu. Funafuti: coll. J. S. Gardiner, 1 ov. F 5.1 x 7.2 mm ( UMZC Reg. 11.01.1897; holotype of Pachygrapsus laevis Borradaile, 1900 ) .
French Polynesia. Tuamotu Archip.: Fakarava Atoll , coll. RV Albatross, 12 October 1899, 1 F 3.6 x 4.9 mm ( USNM 33179 About USNM ) . — Rangiroa Atoll, Avatoru Motu, ca. at 1.5 km E of Post Office, at Pension Henri , reef flat, under rocks, 0–1 meter, coll. G. Paulay, 10 January 2001, 1 M 7.0 x 9.0 mm, 2 ov. F 5.4 x 7.0–5.6 x 7.3 mm ( UF 1490 ) . — Taiaro Atoll, Taiaro Expedition, intertidal, outer reef, 12–20 February 1994, coll. J. Poupin, 1 ov. F 4.6 x 6.0 mm ( MNHN B29264) .
Hawaiian Is.: Honolulu, coll. RV Albatross, 1891, 1 ov. F 6.2 x 8.2 mm ( USNM 17320 About USNM , type of P. longipes Rathbun, 1893 ); Honolulu reef, coll. RV Albatross, 6 June 1902, 1 M 9.5 x 11.8 mm ( UNSM 29350 About UNSM ) .
Clipperton Atoll. Among rocks at low tide, JeanLouis Etienne Expedition to Clipperton , coll. J. Poupin, February 2005, 6 M 5.5 x 7.0–9.7 x 11.5 mm, 10 ov. F 4.0 x 6.5–9.5 x 12.0 mm, 1 F 4.5 x 5.5 mm ( MNHN B29859); reef at low tide, stn 33, coll. L. Albenga, J. M. Bouchard, 25 January 2005, 5 M 6.0 x 7.0–7.0 x 8.5 mm, 1 ov. F 6.5 x 8.0 mm, 1 F 4.5 x 5.5 mm ( MNHN B29858) .
Diagnosis
Smallsize species. Carapace with concave lateral margins, markedly convergent posteriorly, without tooth behind exorbital angle ( Fig. 10a View FIGURE 10 ). Dorsal surface flattened, only weakly convex; protogastric, hepatic regions with thin transverse striae, branchial region with oblique striae; all striae glabrous; mesogastric, cardiac, intestinal regions almost totally smooth. Front 0.6 times width at exorbital angles, anterior margin almost straight ( Fig. 10b View FIGURE 10 ). Infraorbital margin nearly entire, composed of low granules, outer indentation very low; infraorbital margin forming very obtuse angle with inner margin of exorbital tooth ( Fig. 14d View FIGURE 14 ).
Cheliped merus with 4–5 acute spines at inner distoventral angle. Carpus with sharp inner dorsodistal spine. Outer face of chelae regularly convex; fixed finger with a longitudinal stria extending slightly on outer face of chela; cutting edge with 2–3 large teeth medially and few smaller teeth proximally. Dactyl with 6–8 small teeth over whole length of cutting edge, sometimes indistinct. Tip of fingers spoonlike, with distinctive rows of bristles ( Fig. 10c View FIGURE 10 ).
Ambulatory legs with scattered long bristles on carpi, propodi, dactyli, but without brush of setae. Upper margins of meri armed with several long mobile spines, lower margins with 1–2 spines (usually 2) at distoventral angles; lower margin of P5 merus smooth, without submedian tubercle ( Fig. 10d–e View FIGURE 10 ).
Abdominal tergites smooth. Telson of male rounded at tip, longer than sixth somite; telson and sixth somite forming triangle with lateral margins slightly concave ( Fig. 10f View FIGURE 10 ). G1 slender, petallike at tip ( Fig. 15d View FIGURE 15 ; see remarks).
Colour (from Clipperton specimens): brown overall, with darker transverse bands on the ambulatory legs: proximal, median and distal bands on meri (sometimes unclear); proximal and distal bands on carpi and propodi; and median band of variable width on dactyli. Eggs orange red.
Measurements: small size; usual carapace size 5 x 7 mm; greatest size indicated in the literature 9 x 11 mm ( Edmondson, 1959; Garth, 1965); specimens examined ranged from: males 5.1 x 6.3–5.6 x 6.8 mm, females 4.6 x 6.0–5.6 x 7.3 mm; smallest ovigerous female 4.6 x 6.0 mm.
Distribution
West Indian Ocean to east Pacific islands: Seychelles; Christmas I,, CocosKeeling Is.; Thailand, Indonesia; South China Sea (Anambas Is., Hainan I., Xisha or Paracel Is); Japan; Caroline Is.; Mariana Is.; Kiribati; Funafuti; Hawaiian Is.; Tuamotu Archip.; Clipperton.
Habitat Common in the high intertidal zone, under rocks and debris.
Remarks
Pachygrapsus planifrons is unique in possessing rows of bristles at the tips of the fingers of the chelae. This character alone is sufficient to distinguish it from all other species of Pachygrapsus . It is similar to P. minutus in its small size, but the two can be easily separated. The exorbital angle is produced and more spinous in P. planifrons than in P. minutus , the lateral margins of the carapace are concave in P. planifrons but straight in P. minutus , the anterior margin of the front is almost straight in P. planifrons but sinuous in P. minutus , the lower margin of the P5 merus is smooth in P. planifrons while having a submedian tubercle in P. minutus and the distal end of the G1 has a short vertical gutterlike process in P. minutus ( Fig. 15c View FIGURE 15 ) but a petallike tip in P. planifrons ( Fig. 15d View FIGURE 15 ).
Chace (1966: 645) indicated that Pachygrapsus was in need of revision and figured the gonopods of 8 species in the USNM collection. These figures have been very useful for the present study and some of them are reproduced in Figure 15 View FIGURE 15 . Some inconsistencies were found with the figure of the G1 of P. planifrons ( Chace, 1966: 645, fig. 11f, a male cl 9.5 mm from Honolulu), however. It has a gutterlike tip instead of tuliplike as shown in Figure 15d View FIGURE 15 , even if the G1 illustrated here is from the same specimen as that of Chace, as its size and collection details were the same, and the G1 was already dissected in the jar. We therefore assume that there was a mistake made when Chace’s plate was being prepared. The tuliplike shape of the P. planifrons G1 was also found in other males examined here, as well as in one illustrated for a Chinese specimen ( Chen, 1980: 140, fig. 225).
Borradaile (1900: 592, pl. 42, fig. 7) described P. laevis from a female collected at Funafuti. The characters described by Borradaile are those of P. planifrons , especially the characteristic rows of bristles at the tips of the fingers of the chelae. The type of P. laevis ( UMZC 11.01.1897) was examined and it can be confirmed that it is a junior synonym of P. planifrons .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Pachygrapsus planifrons De Man, 1888
Poupin, Joseph, Davie, Peter J. F. & Cexus, Jean-Christophe 2005 |
Pachygrapsus laevis
Tesch, J. J. 1918: 76 |
Borradaile, L. A. 1900: 592 |
Pachygrapsus longipes
Rathbun, M. J. 1906: 840 |
Rathbun, M. J. 1893: 247 |
Pachygrapsus planifrons
Komai, T. & Nagai, T. & Yogi, A. & Naruse, T. & Fujita, Y. & Shokita, S 2004: 34 |
Yeo, D. C. J. & Rahayu, D. & Ng, P. K. L. 2004: 88 |
Paulay, G. & Kropp, R. & Ng, P. K. L. & Eldredge, L. G. 2003: 495 |
Ng, P. K. L. & Davie, P. J. F. 2002: 379 |
Dai, A. & Yang, S. 1991: 510 |
Chen, H. 1980: 139 |
Chace, F. A. 1966: 644 |
Garth, J. S. 1965: 30 |
Holthuis, L. B. 1953: 31 |
Tweedie, M. W. F. 1936: 45 |
Ward, M. 1934: 25 |
Tesch, J. J. 1918: 77 |
De Man, J. G. 1908: 218 |
De Man, J. G. 1888: 368 |