Celaenorrhinus, Hubner, 1819
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3033.1.1 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6C3D2156-6E4B-FFC4-E0FE-FC4CFBA337DA |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Celaenorrhinus |
status |
|
Celaenorrhinus View in CoL undescribed nr. dargei Berger 1976 ( Figures 1.2 View FIGURE 1 , 3–5 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 )
T.B. Larsen (pers. comm. 2010) pointed out to me that the species known as C. proxima proxima in Kakamega Forest actually comprises two species, separated most easily by whether the two white spots in space 1B of the fore wing are separate ( C. proxima proxima ) or touching (C. undescribed nr. dargei ; Figure 3 View FIGURE 3 ). On examining my material, I note that both species are present and that the valves of the male genitalia are also very distinct.
One or both of this species pair is normally to be found at Kakamega Forest, i.e. I would expect to see one or both on nearly every visit. One or both are common in the forest near the Rest House, and in the stretch by Ikuywa Stream, but less common in the North around the Park HQ. T.B. Larsen (pers. comm. 2010) considered the undescribed species to be more common, and while that is the only one of the two that I have photographed in the wild ( Figure 3 View FIGURE 3 ), I have slightly more specimens of C. proxima proxima in my collection.
Adult behaviour
In the 1980s–90s, I was not aware that C. proxima proxima in Kakamega Forest was partly this undescribed species, so the following is based on observations of both species combined. The adults fly throughout the day, coming to feed at most of the ground layer nectar flowers in the forest, notably Justicia flava . Feeding is always with the wings held flat ( Figure 3.1 View FIGURE 3 ). Although most active in the sun, they continue feeding in light rain when they are easier to observe and photograph. Males can be found perched on vegetation 1–2 m above the ground along the edge of the forest, along tracks and in clearings. They usually rest under leaves with their wings held flat, but sometimes, especially early in the morning, rest on the leaf upper surface in a patch of sunlight.
Food plants
I reared this species from two collections from Kakamega Forest in 1991 (91/35 on 16 Jun, 91/39 on 17 Jun), but thinking that the caterpillars were C. proxima proxima which I had reared several times before, I paid scant attention to the details, although fortunately I photographed one final instar caterpillar ( Figure 4 View FIGURE 4 ). Both collections were on Mimulopsis solmsii (Acanthaceae) , which is also a food plant for C. proxima proxima .
Leaf shelters Ovum
The eclosed ova associated with stage 1 shelters of the two caterpillars that were reared were rounded, flattened on the bottom, 0.86 mm diameter, and although almost smooth, had around 40 very fine ribs becoming irregular near the top of the ovum.
Caterpillar
The caterpillars were not distinguished from those of C. proxima proxima , and although no details were recorded, a final instar caterpillar was photographed ( Figure 4 View FIGURE 4 ). Head capsules measured 2.9 x 2.8 mm final instar, 1.96 x 1.94 mm penultimate instar, and 1.33 x 1.31 mm n–2 instar, wide x high. Although the head capsule seems the same as that of C. proxima proxima , the body is less translucent, having an overall paler appearance, perhaps due to, or partly due to, the underlying fat bodies. Further collections are needed to confirm that this is a specific difference rather than an individual one.
Pupa
No details were recorded, except that both pupae took 12 days to emerge. Examination of the emerged pupae showed them to be very similar those of C. proxima proxima . Based on limited material, the central frontal projec-
forwards ( Figures 1.3–5 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 ). There also appear to be subtle differences around the cremaster, but I would want to examine more material before concluding that these were consistent differences.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |