Cincticostella gosei (Allen, 1975)

Martynov, Alexander V., Selvakumar, C., Palatov, Dmitry M., Subramanian, K. A., Sivaramakrishnan, K. G., Vasanth, M. & Jacobus, Luke M., 2021, Overview of Indian and Nepali representatives of the Cincticostella nigra (Ueno, 1928) complex (Ephemeroptera, Ephemerellidae), with discussion about Cincticostella Allen, 1971 species complexes, ZooKeys 1040, pp. 123-166 : 123

publication ID

https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1040.64280

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E593F4D8-450E-4D1A-AF0E-1CD2BBB04905

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6B152F9E-1CC4-565E-A2B1-B9B1CF91E3EF

treatment provided by

ZooKeys by Pensoft

scientific name

Cincticostella gosei (Allen, 1975)
status

 

Cincticostella gosei (Allen, 1975) Figs 13 View Figure 13 , 14 View Figure 14 , 15 View Figure 15

Ephemerella (Cincticostella) gosei Allen, 1975

Serratella thailandensis Allen, 1980 (junior objective synonym, Edmunds and Murvosh 1995)

Diagnosis.

This species can be distinguished from other Cincticostella species by the following combination of characters: (i) head brown, with three white to yellow spots near ocelli (spots near lateral ocelli the largest) (Fig. 13A, B View Figure 13 ); (ii) body covered with numerous large scale sockets and small scales in some of them (Figs 13B-E View Figure 13 , 14A-C View Figure 14 , 15A-C View Figure 15 ); (iii) head without paired protuberances (Fig. 13B View Figure 13 ); (iv) genae moderately developed (Fig. 13B View Figure 13 ); (v) labrum with moderate anteromedian emargination (Fig. 14C View Figure 14 ); (vi) maxillary palp absent (Fig. 14E View Figure 14 ); (vii) glossae short, inner margins of paraglossae subparallel to longitudinal axis of body, held tightly against glossae (Fig. 14G View Figure 14 ); (viii) labial palp segments I and II not flattened, elongated (Fig. 14F, G View Figure 14 ); (ix) prothoracic anterolateral projections well-developed, bluntly pointed, directed forward (Fig. 13C, D View Figure 13 ); (x) mesothoracic anterolateral projections poorly developed, not notched, rounded (Fig. 13C, D View Figure 13 ); (xi) setal transverse band on dorsal surface of fore femur consisting of only several middle-sized stout setae; sometimes stout setae absent absolutely; (xii) inner margin of fore femur only with scattered, thin, hair-like setae (Fig. 15A View Figure 15 ); (xiii) middle and hind femora moderately widened (Fig. 15B, C View Figure 15 ); (xiv) dorsal surfaces of middle and hind femora without stout setae (Figs 13E View Figure 13 , 15B, C View Figure 15 ); (xv) outer margins of middle and hind femora without expressed projections (Fig. 15B, C View Figure 15 ); (xvi) tarsal claw with 5-6 denticles and several subapical setae (Fig. 15D View Figure 15 ); (xvii) small paired submedial projections present on terga II-IX; projections on tergum IX broad and rounded (Fig. 13F View Figure 13 ).

Distribution.

Thailand ( Allen 1975, 1980) and the India-China border region (new data).

Remarks.

The larva of this species was properly described from Thailand by Allen (1975, 1980). We report this species for the first time from India. Adult stages are unknown. Main distinguishing characters of species are shown on Figs 13 View Figure 13 - 15 View Figure 15 . The characters typical for representatives of C. insolta and C. nigra complexes are analysed because of the separate position of this species (see below).

Habitat.

Cold fast-flowing river with cobbles and gravel. The Ranga River habitat is shown in Martynov et al. (2019: fig. 152).

Material examined.

India: 17 larvae, Arunachal Pradesh, Lower Subansiri District, Ranga River , 27.396404°N, 93.757378°E, h ~ 625 m a.s.l., 06.xi.2015, Coll. Bikramjit Sinha - IN 5346/H13 [ZSI] GoogleMaps .