Melanomys Thomas 1902
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7316535 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11325242 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/68EADD6F-2A52-78B0-07DB-7BED35693EA4 |
treatment provided by |
Guido |
scientific name |
Melanomys Thomas 1902 |
status |
|
Melanomys Thomas 1902 View in CoL
Melanomys Thomas 1902 View in CoL , Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 7, 10: 248.
Type Species: Oryzomys phaeopus Thomas 1894
Species and subspecies: 3 species:
Species Melanomys caliginosus (Tomes 1860)
Species Melanomys robustulus Thomas 1914
Species Melanomys zunigae Sanborn 1949
Discussion: Oryzomyini . Usually arranged as a subgenus of Oryzomys since Goldman’s (1918) revision (e.g., Cabrera, 1961; Ellerman, 1941; Hall, 1981; Reig, 1986; Tate, 1932e). J. A. Allen (1913), however, provided morphological criteria, as contrasted to the type species (= Mus palustris ) of Oryzomys , defending his retention of Melanomys as a genus, as did Gyldenstolpe (1932); its synonymy in Oryzomys proper deserves more rigorous, character-based, phylogenetic substantiation. The taxon has not been revised; the three nominal species listed stem from Cabrera (1961), who acknowledged his solely literature-based interpretation as provisional; Allen (1913) had recognized nine and Gyldenstolpe (1932) listed eight. A morphologically distinctive and distributionally circumscribed taxon ripe for revisionary and biogeographic study.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Sigmodontinae |
Melanomys Thomas 1902
Wilson, Don E. & Reeder, DeeAnn 2005 |
Melanomys
Thomas 1902: 248 |