Sapromyza bisigillata Rondani, 1868
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4989.1.1 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:89C63841-3CF4-491D-8C73-BEF7DCB18FB5 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4981152 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/686387A0-FF4F-FF29-5889-FDCCFEB962BA |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Sapromyza bisigillata Rondani, 1868 |
| status |
|
Sapromyza bisigillata Rondani, 1868 View in CoL View at ENA
ORIGINAL DESCRIPTION: 1868c: 239 (key), 250 (description).
TYPE LOCALITY: “ in Pedemontio [Piedmont ( Italy)]” .
TYPE MATERIAL: 1 ♀, syntype ( MRSN): 816 / [illegible word] / Sapromyza Fall. bisigillata Bell., Stura [= Stura Valley (Piedmont)]; 1 ♀, syntype ( MRSN): Sapromyza Fall. bisigillata Bell., Stura [= Stura Valley (Piedmont)].
CURRENT STATUS: valid species ( Papp 1984a: 213).
REMARKS: Rondani (1868c: 250) described Sapromyza bisigillata from just the female sex without specifying either the number or the length of the specimens: “ Rarissimo lecta foemina [The female collected rarely]” received from L. Bellardi, to whom he attributed the species name. Rondani (1868c: 250) erroneously listed this nominal species as a male but explicitly referred to a female in the description. We found two female syntypes in this study.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |