Dieunomia heteropoda heteropoda (Say)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.17161/jom.v0i29.4652 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13159034 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/68226B4F-B578-FFA8-FE42-5E12FE2766E6 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Dieunomia heteropoda heteropoda (Say) |
status |
|
Dieunomia heteropoda heteropoda (Say) View in CoL
( Figs. 21–22 View Figures 16–21 View Figures 22–23 )
Nomia (?) heteropoda Say, 1824: 349 View in CoL (♂).
Andrena valida Say, 1837: 393 (♀).
Nomia heteropoda valida (Say) : Cockerell, 1934: 4 (synonymy).
Nomia heteropoda validescens Blair, 1935: 206 (♂).
Nomia heteropoda subvalida Blair, 1935:206 (♀).
Nomia (Dieunomia) heteropoda heteropoda (Say) : Michener, 1951: 1128 (catalog); Mitchell, 1960: 507 (♀ ♂ redescription); Hurd, 1979: 1945 (catalog); Moure & Hurd, 1987: 40 (catalog).
This is a highly distinctive species, which is unlikely to be mistaken for any other bee in the state. It can easily be recognized by its large size (> 17 mm), andreniform body shape, and dark body, pubescence, and wings ( Fig. 22 View Figures 22–23 ). The first and third submarginal cells are approximately equal in length, and each are much longer than the second cell. A distinctive feature of the male is the enlarged metatibia ( Fig. 23 View Figures 22–23 ), which is used to grasp the female during mating ( Wcislo & Buchmann, 1995).
This species has been collected from the following sites in southwest Michigan: Allegan Co.: 4.5 km south of Pullman, 17 July 2013 [ MSUC], 15 August 2013 [J.G. private collection]; Allegan State Game Area , T2 N R14 W Sec. 18, 2 August 2003 [ MSUC]; Berrien Co. : 4 km west of Berrien Springs [ MSUC]; Van Buren Co. : 4 km north by northwest of Almena 20 July 2011, 08 August 2011, 10 July 2012 [ MSUC] ( Fig. 24 View Figure 24 ). Although this bee is very distinctive we do not know of any Michigan specimens preceding 2003. There is a single specimen deposited at the University of Guelph Insect Collection collected on 15 July 2007 at Black Oak Heritage Park (C. Sheffield, pers. comm.), which is part of the Ojibway Prairie Complex in Windsor , Ontario. This record suggests that D. heteropoda may be present in southern counties across the state of Michigan. It is possible that the lack of earlier records of this distinctive bee are due to a recent range extension, but the lack of thorough collection effort in the state makes this difficult to determine.
Dieunomia heteropoda View in CoL is primarily an oligolege of Helianthus ( Hurd et al., 1980) View in CoL . In Michigan, it has been collected from Helianthus View in CoL , Ratibida pinnata (Vent.) Barnhart View in CoL , Rudbeckia hirta View in CoL , and Centaurea View in CoL L. ( Asteraceae View in CoL ). Females usually make solitary nests ( Parker et al., 1986; Wcislo, 1993), but may sometimes behave as communal nesters ( Wcislo, 1993; Wcislo & Engel, 1996).
MSUC |
USA, Michigan, East Lansing, Michigan State University |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SuperFamily |
Apoidea |
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Nomiinae |
Genus |
Dieunomia heteropoda heteropoda (Say)
Gibbs, Jason, Dumesh, Sheila & Griswold, Terry L. 2014 |
Nomia (Dieunomia) heteropoda heteropoda (Say)
Moure, J. S. & P. D. Hurd, Jr. 1987: 40 |
Hurd, P. D., Jr. 1979: 1945 |
Mitchell, T. B. 1960: 507 |
Michener, C. D. 1951: 1128 |
Nomia heteropoda validescens
Blair, B. H. 1935: 206 |
Nomia heteropoda subvalida
Blair, B. H. 1935: 206 |
Nomia heteropoda valida (Say)
Cockerell, T. D. A. 1934: 4 |
Andrena valida
Say, T. 1837: 393 |
Nomia (?) heteropoda Say, 1824: 349
Say, T. 1824: 349 |