Pseudoanthidium
View in CoL
Subgenus
Exanthidium ( Pasteels, 1969)
Exanthidium
was erected by Pasteels (1969) with
eximium Giraud, 1863
View in CoL
(
= excisum Mocsáry, 1884
View in CoL
) as type species. Additionally to the type species, he included two species,
E. enslini Alfken, 1928
and
E. wahrmanicum Mavromoustakis, 1953
View in CoL
. Later, he described
E. guichardi Pasteels, 1980
View in CoL
which he also included in this genus ( Pasteels 1980). Warncke (1980) treated
Exanthidium
as subgenus of
Anthidium
View in CoL
and listed additionally
Anthidium pictipes Morawitz, 1894
View in CoL
, but without including this taxon in his key and without integrating it into his consecutive numbering. Michener & Griswold (1994) and Michener (2007) proposed recognising
Pseudoanthidium Friese, 1898
View in CoL
on the genus level, and
Exanthidium
herewith as one of its subgenera.
The characterisation of
Exanthidium
by coherent traits valid for all taxa remains challenging. According to Michener (2007), the character traits of the female of
Exanthidium
include a small, midapical, marginal lobe on the apical margin of T5. Such a lobe, however, was observed only in
P. wahrmanicum
View in CoL
, not in
P. enslini
and
P. eximium
View in CoL
(the females of the other species are unknown). A broadly rounded or truncate, somewhat denticulate apex with a pair of small, shining, depressed median lobes on either side of a notch of T6 was mentioned as another character trait by Michener (2007). These lobes were, however, observed only in
P. enslini
and
P. eximium
View in CoL
, not in
P. wahrmanicum
View in CoL
(the females of the other species are unknown). Litman et al. (2016) additionally mentioned a lateral spine on T6 as a trait characterising
Exanthidium
, but such a spine was observed only in
P. enslini
and
P. eximium
View in CoL
, not in
P. wahrmanicum
View in CoL
and
P. deserticolum
sp. n. The morphological features common to all members of the genus
Exanthidium
thus seem to be less than hitherto assumed.
Exanthidium
is understood here as a group of anthidiine bees whose females are clearly distinct from all other Palaearctic members of
Pseudoanthidium
by an excavated, strongly concave T6. The clypeus is almost flat, the apex slightly curved inward and covered with hair (not protruding and fully exposed as e.g. in
Royanthidium
). The male can be characterised by its long (significantly longer than T6), protruding and deeply bilobed T7, and the absence of combs on the sterna.
The distribution of
Exanthidium
extends from the East Atlantic coast ( Portugal) to Central Asia ( Tajikistan). Michener (2007) also mentions Sudan. It is not known on what basis this statement was made.
Anthidium brevithorace Warncke, 1982
shares in the male with
Exanthidium
the long, protruding T7, but has been assigned to the subgenus
Turkanthidium
by Warncke (1982) and is not treated here.