Hydrelliaeucoila rufa Reche, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222933.2022.2064249 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6762495 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/675E87DA-FFCA-7238-FE4D-453AFF6FFEF4 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Hydrelliaeucoila rufa Reche |
status |
sp. nov. |
Hydrelliaeucoila rufa Reche sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:FD3C3F03-EB27-49EB-A828-C2858C33378A
( Figure 2 View Figure 2 )
Holotype
Female. ARGENTINA. Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, - 34.5997222S, - 58.3819444W. 15 September 1912, A. Zotta coll. (MLP). GoogleMaps
Paratypes
(2 females): ARGENTINA. Buenos Aires, Punta Lara , - 34.8206566S, - 57.9675322W GoogleMaps . 5 April 1974, Samsone Llanos coll . (MLP) GoogleMaps .
Description
Female ( Figure 2a View Figure 2 ). Body length 1.30 mm, sparsely setose. Head, mesosoma and metasoma reddish brown. Antenna, mandibles, wing venation and legs yellowish brown.
Head ( Figure 2b View Figure 2 ). Lateral and inferior area of face smooth, scattered setose; in frontal view with slightly dorso-ventral ridge adjacent to torulus. Malar sulci simple. Antenna with 13 articles, filiform; F1 twice longer than F2; F2–F11 subequal in length; F4–F11 with rhinaria. Compound eyes glabrous. Occiput striated. Vertex smooth. Pronotum. Pronotal plate smooth. Medial bridge of pronotal plate narrow, with lateral foveae open and deep. Dorsal margin of pronotal plate straight. Pronotal carina absent. Sides of pronotum slightly striated and highly setose behind genae.
Mesoscutum ( Figure 2a,c View Figure 2 ). In lateral view as long as wide; smooth and shining. Notauli absent. Parapsidal hair line present. Parascutal impression inconspicuous.
Mesoscutellum. Scutellar foveae at base sculptured, longer than broad. Lateral bars of scutellum striated with a small fovea beneath. Dorsal surface of scutellum ( Figure 2c View Figure 2 ) weakly sculptured, reticulate-areolate; posterior margin round. Scutellar plate ( Figure 2c View Figure 2 ) flat and smooth, not elevated above the scutellum, drop-shaped, covers 1/2 of scutellum in dorsal view; surface smooth without glandular pit; with a dark impression on the entire edge of scutellar plate.
Mesopectum. Mesopleuron striated; with mesopleural carina and precoxal carina conspicuous, without subalar pit.
Metapectal-propodeal complex. Metapleuron slightly striated; anteroventral cavity conspicuous; posterior margin raised and hairy. Propodeum elongate, setose except on the carinae; lateral propodeal carinae subparallel.
Wings. Fore wings highly setose, hyaline, apical margin with hair fringes quite long. Hairless towards the base of wing. Marginal cell ( Figure 2a View Figure 2 ) completely open, elongate, three times longer than broad
Legs. Mid- and hind coxae with a patch of hairs dorsolateral and posterodorsal, respectively.
Metasoma ( Figure 2a View Figure 2 ). Smooth and shining. Hairy ring at base of syntergum complete, woolly, with a weak row of long setae on each side posteriorly; distally smooth.
Variation. Body length 1.20–1.50 mm. Marginal cell twice or three times as long as wide. Hairy ring at base of syntergum complete or incomplete dorsally.
Male. Unknown.
Etymology. In reference to the colouring of the body.
Biology. Host unknown.
Distribution. ( Figure 4 View Figure 4 ). Argentina. It is known only from Ensenada, Buenos Aires province. This distribution belongs to the Pampean province (Chacoan subregion).
Comments. Hydrelliaeucoila rufa sp. nov. differs from the other two species known from Argentina by presenting the following combination of characters: head and mesosoma reddish brown (black in H. egeria ; dark brown in H. nonstriata sp. nov.); lateral and inferior area of face smooth (striated in H. egeria ); head in frontal view with carina adjacent to torulus (absent in H. nonstriata sp. nov.); medial bridge of pronotal plate narrow (broad in H. egeria ); with a dark impression on the entire edge of scutellar plate (without a dark impression on the entire edge in H. egeria and H. nonstriata sp. nov.).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |