Tachys corax LeConte, 1852
|
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.245.3416 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6680F7F9-5D87-3036-E0C9-00FF753C8127 |
|
treatment provided by |
|
|
scientific name |
Tachys corax LeConte, 1852 |
| status |
|
Tachys corax LeConte, 1852a: 194. Type locality: "ad flumen Novum [= New River, Imperial County], desertorum Colorado [California]" (original citation). Holotype [by monotypy] (♀) in MCZ [# 5572].
Tachys funebris Casey, 1918: 205. Type locality: "Provo [Utah County], Utah" (original citation). Lectotype (♀), designated by Erwin (1974a: 147), in USNM [# 46954]. Synonymy established by Erwin (1974a: 147).
Tachys esurialis Casey, 1918: 209. Type locality: "San Diego [San Diego County], California" (original citation). Lectotype (♀), designated by Erwin (1974a: 147), in USNM [# 46953]. Synonymy established by Erwin (1974a: 147).
Distribution.
This species ranges from eastern Washington (Hatch 1953: 104) to “Montana” (Hayward 1900: 223), south to western Texas (Dajoz 2007: 23), southeastern New Mexico (Chaves County, CNC), and the Baja California Peninsula (Horn 1894: 308). The records from “Nebraska” and “Texas” (Hayward 1900: 223) probably refer to Tachys halophilus Lindroth.
Records.
USA: AZ, CA, CO, MT, NM, NV, OR, TX, UT, WA - Mexico
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Tachys corax LeConte, 1852
| Bousquet, Yves 2012 |
Tachys funebris
| Casey 1918 |
Tachys esurialis
| Casey 1918 |
Tachys corax
| LeConte 1852 |