Costanana xenomorpha, Domahovski & Cavichioli, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2023.889.2245 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:52E11625-6E26-4E4F-8B15-05195087BAB4 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8271511 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/ED50364A-7B8F-4082-85EA-214F8FE69F01 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:ED50364A-7B8F-4082-85EA-214F8FE69F01 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Costanana xenomorpha |
status |
sp. nov. |
Costanana xenomorpha View in CoL sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:ED50364A-7B8F-4082-85EA-214F8FE69F01
Figs 10 View Fig , 12G–H View Fig
Diagnosis
Coloration ( Fig. 12G View Fig ) of head and pronotum brown with small black maculae, forewing costal margin with broad light yellow macula on anterior third and large depigmented (white) macula on apical third. Style ( Fig. 10K View Fig ) blade without processes near base or apical portion, ventral margin serrated; apex abruptly curved dorsally. Aedeagus ( Fig. 10L–M View Fig ) without processes near base; apical portion with four pairs of lateral processes and an unpaired subapical process on ventral surface.
Etymology
The new species name comes from the Greek ‘ xeno ’ (‘strange’, ‘unusual’) + ‘ morpha ’ (‘form’, ‘shape’). It refers to the unusual shape of the male genital structures. It also alludes to the fictional extraterrestrial “xenomorphs” from the classic film “Alien”, due to the aedeagus, in posterior view, resembling the creature named “face hugger”.
Material examined
Holotype PERU • ♂; “Peru, Cuzco, Ttio , \ 30.viii.2012, (Light) \ 13º31’69”S 70º53’79”W, \ 2000m / R.R. Cavichioli leg.”, “ DZUP 215490 View Materials ”; MUSM.
Description
Male
MEASUREMENTS. Holotype male: total length 9.3 mm.
COLORATION. Dorsal portion of head and thorax light brown ( Figs 10A, C View Fig , 12G View Fig ); ventral portion yellow ( Figs 8B–C View Fig , 12H View Fig ). Crown ( Fig. 10A View Fig ) with transverse irregular black stripe; pair of rounded black spots behind ocelli, near posterior margin; ocelli red. Pronotum ( Fig. 10A View Fig ) with black irregular maculae and yellow areas near anterior margin; lateral margin yellow. Mesonotum ( Fig. 10A View Fig ) with two pairs of black and two pairs of yellow submedian maculae. Face ( Fig. 10B View Fig ) epistomal suture and apex of clypeus with pair of lateral black maculae. Forewing ( Fig. 10D View Fig ) costal margin with large triangular light yellow macula on anterior fourth and a large rounded depigmented (white) macula at level of outer anteapical cell, remaining portion of costal cell, apical cells, apex of clavus and appendix dark brown; apical portion of clavus yellowish. Legs ( Fig. 12H View Fig ) yellow with apex of tibiae dark brown.
STRUCTURE. Head in dorsal view ( Fig. 10A View Fig ): median length shorter than interocular width; transocular width of head eight tenths humeral width of pronotum; in lateral view ( Fig. 10C View Fig ), with anterior margin thick, with 7–8 carinae. Forewing ( Fig. 10D View Fig ) with inner discal cell not distinctly shorter than outer discal cell; apex rounded. Profemur AV row with 6 setae restricted to basal half and PV row with about 10 setae distributed from base to apex. Protibia PD row with 4 long setae and apical PD 1 seta developed; PV row developed, with 6–7 setae increasing in thickness and length towards apex. Metatibia rows PD, AD, and AV with 23, 13, and 15 macrosetae, respectively. Metatarsomere I apex with 3 platellae. Metatarsomere II apex with 2 apical platellae. Other characteristics as in the generic description.
MALE TERMINALIA. Sternite VIII ( Fig. 10E View Fig ) 1.3× as wide as long; lateral margins straight and parallel at basal fourth and rounded distally; posterolateral angles rounded; posterior margin almost straight, weakly produced medially. Valve ( Fig. 10F View Fig ) 2× as wide as long; posterior margin rounded, weakly emarginated medially. Pygofer ( Fig. 10G View Fig ), in lateral view, 2× as long as maximum height; basodorsal process present but weakly developed; ventral margin broadly rounded; posterodorsal margin excavated; external surface near ventral margin with a few short setae; macrosetae distributed on posterodorsal quadrant; apex produced and rounded, curved inwards, inner surface with short filiform setae and a small dentiform process. Anal tube (segment X) sclerotized, without processes. Subgenital plate ( Fig. 10G View Fig ), in lateral view, not surpassing apex of pygofer; in ventral view ( Fig. 10H View Fig ), 3.1× as long as wide, strongly broadened medially; lateral margins rounded; external margin with minute setae; apex rounded, well sclerotized. Connective ( Fig. 10I View Fig ) T-shaped; arms well produced laterally; stalk narrow, short, one-third as long as maximum width of arms; median keel weakly developed. Style ( Fig. 10J View Fig ), in dorsal view, with outer lobe well developed, rounded; in lateral view ( Fig. 10K View Fig ), blade slender, sinuous; ventral margin serrated; apex abruptly curved dorsally and acute. Aedeagus ( Fig. 10L–M View Fig ) preatrium weakly developed; dorsal apodeme produced dorsally but not laterally, dorsal margin straight; shaft long and slender, almost cylindrical, sigmoid; apical portion with four pairs of processes; two pairs of lateral processes adjacent to each other, directed laterally; long pair almost apical, thicker and longer than preceding ones, directed ventrolaterally; and a short apical claw-like pair directed dorsally; posterior surface with a unpaired subapical process curved ventrally.
Female
Unknown.
Remarks
The male genitalia of C. xenomorpha sp. nov. differ in several aspects from those of the other species of Costanana as in the larger size of body ( Fig. 12G–H View Fig ); the shape of the sternite VIII, not tapered apically ( Fig. 10E View Fig ); the pygofer with apex curved inwards, bearing a spiniform process ( Fig. 10G View Fig ); the anal tube well sclerotized ( Fig. 10G View Fig ); the subgenital plate broadened subapically, well sclerotized distally, and lacking filiform setae ( Fig. 10H View Fig ); and the connective T-shaped with arms long ( Fig. 10I View Fig ). The shape of the subgenital plate and style is most similar to that of C. dunda . The new species can easily be recognized by the apex of the aedeagus with four pairs of lateral processes and a single subapical process on the ventral surface ( Fig. 10M View Fig ).
MUSM |
Peru, Lima, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Museo de Historia Natural |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SubOrder |
Auchenorrhyncha |
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Iassinae |
Tribe |
Gyponini |
Genus |