Chaetopodella DUDA, 1920

Papp, L., 2008, Afrotropical Species Of Chaetopodella Duda (Diptera: Sphaeroceridae), Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 54 (3), pp. 235-255 : 236

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.12585046

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/647F87A3-FFE0-7375-FDB5-FE3BFD49FA37

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Chaetopodella DUDA, 1920
status

 

Chaetopodella DUDA, 1920 View in CoL

Chaetopodella DUDA, 1920: 435 View in CoL [as subgenus of Limosina MACQUART, 1835 View in CoL ].

Type species: Limosina scutellaris HALIDAY, 1836: 329 (mon.).

Chaetopodella DUDA, 1920 View in CoL : HACKMAN (1969: 203), ROHÁČEK (1983: 112), etc., as genus.

ROHÁČEK (1983) discussed correctly its morphology, incl. that of the genitalia. Characters of the genus were corroborated and supplemented by HAYASHI and PAPP (2007).

The Chaetopodella species are distributed in the Palaearctic (by its type species only), in the Oriental ( HAYASHI & PAPP 2007) and in the Afrotropical regions ( HACKMAN 1969). As we wrote there, the status of the Leptocera (Chaetopodella) albocincta RICHARDS, 1964 View in CoL (from the Solomon Is, Vanuatu) needs revision. The Neotropical species Leptocera biseta DUDA, 1925 View in CoL has been transferred to the genus Gyretria ENDERLEIN, 1938 (cf. ROHÁČEK et al. (2001). Leptocera (Chaetopodella) tonsa DUDA, 1925 View in CoL from Costa Rica belongs to an undescribed genus (see MARSHALL 2001).

Hitherto four Afrotropical species have been described: Ch. cursoni ( RICHARDS, 1939) View in CoL , Ch. denigrata ( DUDA, 1925) View in CoL , Ch. impermissa ( RICHARDS, 1980) (syn. Ch. congensis (VANSCHUYTBROECK, 1950)) and Ch. lesnei ( SÉGUY, 1933) . Chaetopodella scutellaris ( HALIDAY, 1836) View in CoL was also recorded from the Afrotropical region (see RICHARDS 1980) but all these records were obviously based on misidentifications (see below).

This paper includes descriptions of a new subgenus and of five new species. Having had the experience with the females of Chaetopodella that they are difficult to differentiate, particularly so for those species pairs as Ch. cursoni and Ch. aethiopica , the importance of the male genital characters are stressed. The features, which seem proper in the identification of the specimens (both males and females) are given in the key below.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Diptera

Family

Sphaeroceridae

Loc

Chaetopodella DUDA, 1920

Papp, L. 2008
2008
Loc

Chaetopodella

ROHACEK, J. 1983: 112
HACKMAN, W. 1969: 203
1969
Loc

Chaetopodella

DUDA, O. 1920: 435
1920
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF