Borneocola petiolatus (K.Schum.) Y.Y.Sam, 2016
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.75.9837 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6368B8D6-AAE1-5917-90E1-8B17D274C70C |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Borneocola petiolatus (K.Schum.) Y.Y.Sam |
status |
comb. nov. |
5. Borneocola petiolatus (K.Schum.) Y.Y.Sam comb. nov.
Haplochorema petiolatum K.Schum. in Engler, Pflanzenr. IV, 46 (Heft 20): 90 (1904). Scaphochlamys petiolata (K.Schum.) R.M.Sm., Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh 44: 210 (1987).
Type.
MALAYSIA. Sarawak, First Division, Mt. Singhi (= Gunung Singai), Dec 1892, Haviland 2026 (lectotype: K! designated by Searle 2010; isolectotype: E!, SAR!) .
Notes.
Borneocola petiolatus is distinguished by its long petiole and narrow leaves from the other species. Its lamina length is almost 3 times the width (12-21.5 × 3.1-7.1 cm). Smith (1987) found that Borneocola petiolatus has small inflorescences as in Borneocola argenteus . However, both can be easily separated by their leaf characters. Borneocola petiolatus has much longer petioles compared to Borneocola argentea (12.7-31.5 cm versus 3-6 cm). Borneocola argenteus also has prominently raised lateral veins on the adaxial surface of lamina, more conspicuous on dried specimens than fresh materials. This character is lacking in Borneocola petiolatus .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Borneocola petiolatus (K.Schum.) Y.Y.Sam
Sam, Yen Yen, Takano, Atsuko, Ibrahim, Halijah, Zaveska, Eliska & Aziz, Fazimah 2016 |
Haplochorema petiolatum
Sam & Takano & Ibrahim & Záveská & Aziz 2016 |
Scaphochlamys petiolata
Sam & Takano & Ibrahim & Záveská & Aziz 2016 |