Lithodidae, Samouelle, 1819

McLaughlin, P. A., 2003, Illustrated keys to families and genera of the superfamily Paguroidea (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura), with diagnoses of genera of Paguridae, Memoirs of Museum Victoria 60 (1), pp. 111-144 : 114-115

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.24199/j.mmv.2003.60.16

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6367985A-FFC0-FFC0-3FCE-767FFCBFFB56

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Lithodidae
status

 

Key to genera of Lithodidae View in CoL

1. Abdomen usually soft, membranous, sac-like; abdominal tergites 3–5 not fully calcified ( Figs 1i View Figure 1 , 9a–d View Figure 9 ) rostral process short, broad, triangular, not usually overreaching distal margins of corneas....................... 2

— Abdomen generally firm, at least partially calcified, not sac-like; abdominal tergites 3–5 usually well calcified ( Figs 9f–k View Figure 9 ), sometimes with median areas membranous; rostral process well-developed, prominent, truncate or spiniform ( Fig. 8f, h View Figure 8 ), overreaching distal margins of corneas ( Fig. 3b View Figure 3 )............................. 6

2. Tergite of abdominal somite 2 divided into median, paired lateral and paired marginal plates ( Figs 9a, b, d, e, h View Figure 9 ). 3

— Tergite of abdominal somite 2 divided into paired lateral and marginal plates, median plate virtually nonexistent ( Fig. 9c View Figure 9 )................ Placetron Schalfeew, 1892 View in CoL

3. Median plate of abdominal somite 2 well calcified or with cluster of calcified granules ( Figs 9a, b View Figure 9 )............ 4

— Median plate of abdominal somite 2 membranous ( Fig. 9d View Figure 9 ) ........................................... 5

4. Carapace well calcified, dorsal surface and margins armed with numerous subequal spines; rostral process with dorsal and lateral spines....... Acantholithodes Holmes, 1895

— Carapace weakly calcified, dorsal surface lacking spines but setose or pubescent; rostral process simple, lacking dorsal and lateral spines ( Fig. 1i View Figure 1 )......................................... Hapalogaster Brandt, 1850

5. Surface of carapace covered with squamose prominences, chelipeds tuberculate ( Fig. 6p View Figure 6 ).......................................... Oedignathus Benedict, 1895

— Surface of carapace and chelipeds covered with transverse ridges or crests ( Fig. 6q View Figure 6 )..... Dermaturus Brandt, 1850

6. Carapace nearly smooth, unarmed, broader than long and completely covering ambulatory legs when legs are drawn in against body ( Figs 1h View Figure 1 , 8h View Figure 8 ); rostral process broad, compressed, distally truncate ( Fig. 1h View Figure 1 , 8h View Figure 8 ).................................... Cryptolithodes Brandt, 1848 View in CoL

— Carapace armed with granules, tubercles or spines, not broader than long and not completely covering ambulatory legs when legs are drawn in against body; rostral process variable in shape, but not compressed and distally truncate...........................................7

7. Sternite of somite XI (pereopods 2) with deep longitudinal medial groove or pit ( Fig. 2n View Figure 2 )................... 8

— Sternite of somite XI (pereopods 2) without deep longitudinal medial groove or pit................ 10

8. Tergite of abdominal somite 2 subdivided into median and paired lateral and marginal plates ( Figs 9a, b, d, e, h View Figure 9 ). 9

— Tergite of abdominal somite 2 usually subdivided into median and paired marginal plates ( Fig. 9i View Figure 9 ), rarely undivided................. Lithodes Latreille, 1806 View in CoL

9. Tergites of abdominal somites 3–5 with only spinulose or spiniform nodules calcified ( Fig. 9e View Figure 9 ) in males; females with lateral plates of left side well delineated; antennal acicle usually absent................................... Neolithodes A. Milne-Edwards and Bouvier, 1894 View in CoL

— Tergites of abdominal somites 3–5 with lateral plates clearly delineated in both sexes, median plate with nodular calcification, accessory marginal plates well developed ( Figs 9h, i View Figure 9 ); antennal acicle present........................................ Paralithodes Brandt, 1848 View in CoL

10. Tergite of abdominal somite 2 subdivided into 3–5 well calcified plates ( Figs 9 e, f, h, i View Figure 9 )................. 11

— Tergite of abdominal somite 2 undivided ( Figs 9g, j, k View Figure 9 )............................................12

11. Tergite of abdominal somite 2 subdivided into 3 plates (median and paired laterals) ( Fig. 9f View Figure 9 )..................................... Phyllolithodes Brandt, 1848 View in CoL

— Tergite of abdominal somite 2 subdivided into 5 plates (median, paired lateral and marginal) ( Figs 9e, h View Figure 9 )........................... Rhinolithode s Brandt, 1848

12. Rostral process thick, non-spiniform, hammer-shaped ( Fig. 1j View Figure 1 ); antennal acicle small, rudimentary; tergites of abdominal somites 4 and 5 with median plates irregularly calcified............. Sculptolithodes Makarov, 1934 View in CoL

— Rostral process more or less spiniform; antennal acicle well-developed; tergites of abdominal somites 4 and 5 with median plates regularly and entirely calcified ( Figs 9f, g, j, k View Figure 9 ) .................................... 13

13. Rostral process formed by anterior process (basal spine) and dorsal spine or granule ( Fig. 8g View Figure 8 )..................................... Glyptholithodes Faxon, 1895

— Rostral process formed by anterior process (basal spine) and at least 1 pair of dorsal spines ( Fig. 8f View Figure 8 )........ 14

14. Lateral tergal plates of abdominal somite 3 entire ( Figs 9f, j View Figure 9 ); antennal acicle moderately spinulose; walking leg 3 always equal to or longer than carapace width.................................. Paralomis White, 1856 View in CoL

— Lateral tergal plates of abdominal somite 3 each with small accessory plates sundered anteromedially ( Figs 9g, k View Figure 9 ); antennal acicle extremely spinulose; walking leg 3 never equal to or longer than carapace width.................................... Lopholithodes Brandt, 1848 View in CoL

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Malacostraca

Order

Decapoda

Family

Lithodidae

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF