Paraploderus grandis, Makranczy, 2016
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.17109/AZH.62.1.59.2016 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C3C8CD4C-BE30-4829-A61A-D2DBD6E98877 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/63BF5FDA-7CB1-4AC3-ABA8-4FBC71C8AF46 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:63BF5FDA-7CB1-4AC3-ABA8-4FBC71C8AF46 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Paraploderus grandis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Paraploderus grandis View in CoL sp. n.
(Figs 12–17, 89)
Typematerial – Holotype (m): KENYA: Mt. Elgon, [Kaptegariver], 2380 m [01°10’N, 34°43’E], 17.I.1979, leg. Th. Palm, [sifting moist grass litter] ( MZLU) GoogleMaps ; Paratypes (34): same dataasholotype (1 m, 1 f, MZLU) ; Mt. Elgon , 1900–2500 m, 12.I.–5.II.1979, leg. Th. Palm (1 m, 8, MZLU, 4, MHNG, 1, HNHM) ; Mt. AberdaresprèsentréeduParkNational, 2300 m [00°27.5’S, 36°51.0’E], 25.XI.1974, leg. V. Mahnert & J-L. Perret (45), tamisagefeuilles mortes et bois mort (5, MHNG, 1, SDEI, 1, ZMHB, 1, NHMW, 1, SMNS, 1, AMNH, 1, FMNH, 1, NMPC, 1, MNHP, 1, CNCI, 1, ISNB) GoogleMaps ; UGANDA: Mt. Elgon , Kapkwata, 2250 m [01°21‘41“N, 34°37‘46“E], 30. V.1993, leg. G. Cuccodoro & D. Erne (16a), vegetationaldebris andoldrottingtrunkinpineplantation, sifted (1, MHNG) GoogleMaps ; D. R. CONGO: ParcNational Albert , MassifRuwenzori , Kirivata (Migeri), 1760 m [00°15‘N, 29°47‘E], 10–20.IV.1953, leg. P. Vanschuytbroeck & J. Kekenbosch (3171-3202) (1, MRAC, 1 m, BMNH) GoogleMaps .
Description – Measurements (in mm, n = 10): EW = 0.56 (0.54–0.58); TW = 0.59 (0.56– 0.62); PW = 0.66 (0.62–0.69); SW = 0.65 (0.62–0.68); AW = 0.85 (0.81–0.90); HL = 0.39 (0.38– 0.41); EL = 0.12 (0.11–0.13); TL = 0.14 (0.13–0.15); PL = 0.46 (0.43–0.49); SL = 0.56 (0.53–0.62); SC = 0.52 (0.49–0.57); FB = 1.51 (1.42–1.63); BL = 3.16 (2.89–3.42). Habitus as in Fig. 89. Pro- View Figs 88–90 notumandelytradarkbrownwithreddishtint. Headblackishdarkbrown, towardscly- peuslighter, epistomalsuturedarker. Abdomendarkbrown, withmorereddishapicesof tergites. Legs, basalantennomeresandmouthpartsmediumbrown, antennalarticles 3–10 darkbrown, ultimateantennomerelighteratapex. Head transversewithrounded, bulging templeswiderthaneyes. Clypeusalmostimpunctatewithonlyfeebletracesofmicrosculptureandthefinestpuncturesonsurface. Epistomalsuturebetweentipsofsupraantennal prominencesoronlyalittlebehindimaginarylineconnectingthem. Medialportionofoc- cipitalgroovebendinganteriorly, neckmediallyshiny, laterallywithtracesofcoriaceous microsculpturewithisodiametriccells. Vertexwithindefinite-borderedbutlargeanddeep puncturesonlyonimpressedparts, elevatedmiddleunpunctured; somealsoneartemplesbutventrallypunctationturningintoruggednessaroundeyes, obscuringapostocularridge. Faintlongitudinalimpressionsrunningonbothsidesofvertexfromepistomal suturetooccipitalgroove, becomingmoremarkedposteriorly. Headsurfaceotherwise shiny, withoutmicrosculpture. Pronotum withcomplete, thinmarginalbead. Surfaceshiny, withoutanymicrosculpturebutpuncturedlikehead, withscattered, indefinite-bordered, mostlyratherlargepits, slightlyumbilicate. Longitudinalmidlineunmarkedbutpunc- turesmissingonabroadstripeonbothsidesandpartlyalonghindmargin. Onbothsides ofmidlinemiddle-posterior 3/5 ofdiscslightlyimpressed. Elytra withdiscgentlyconvex, slightlyimpressedanteriorly, twoverythinandshallowlongitudinalimpressionsalong suturebehindscutellum. Epipleuralridgepresentonalmostentirelength. Thinmarginal beadwithobscureconnectiontoepipleuralridgecontinuingalongposteriormargin, not reachingsuturalcorner, slightlycurvinganteriorlybeforeit. Alongsutureveryfinemar- ginalbeadconspicuousonlybecauseofdarkercolour. Elytralpunctationmoderatelydeep, equallyspaced, moderatelysparse, missingonathin, slightlyelevatedstripealongsuture. Abdomen shinyandsmoothwithonlytinyinsertionpointsofsetaeandextremelyfaint coriaceousmicrosculpturewithisodiametriccells. MalesterniteVIIIasinFig. 15, aedeagus asinFigs 13–14, femalesterniteVIIIasinFig. 16, spermathecaasinFig. 17.
Distribution – Thepresent (restricted) selectionoftypematerialispartlyduetothe factthatthistaxonhassomewhatreducedwingsandisapparentlyfoundathigheral- Figs 13–17. Paraploderus grandis sp. n. 13 = aedeagus, lateral view, 14 = aedeagus, frontal view (parameral setation shown on left), 15 = sternite VIII, male, 16 = sternite VIII, female, 17 = spermatheca. Scales: 0.1 mm for Fig. 17, 0.16 mm for Figs 13–14, 0.3 mm for Figs 15–16. titudes. Amorenarrowrangeofspecimensandlocalitiesperhapsensuresamoreclear identityforthistaxon; theprevioustypeseriesinfactmaybeamixtureofseveralclosely relatedspecies. Asrecognizedhere, thedistributionof P. grandis isconfinedtotheRuwen- zorirange, Mt. AberdaresandMt. Elgon. Atthelatterlocationtherecordedhabitatwas “primevalforestareauphillMountElgonatKaptegariver, deciduousforests, shrub-and tallherbaceousvegetation” – thisdoesnotsuggestaverynarrowdistribution, butfurther materialandworkisnecessarytoclarifytheexactdistributionandvariability.
Etymology – Namedaftertheratherlargesizeofthespecies.
Remarks – ThespecieswasfirstrecognizedbyP. M. Hammond, who labelled a series of specimens with the name ‘ grandis ’ in the 1970s, but it remainedunpublished – hisseries, however, appearsratherheterogenous. At leastitisdifficulttodecidewhetherthespecimensfromavarietyoflocalities reallybelongtothesamespeciesorrepresentcloselyallieddistinctforms. A furthercomplicationiscausedbythefactthatthepresentauthorusedthis Paraploderus speciesforaphylogeneticanalysisin 2005 ( MAKRANCZY 2006) misidentifiedas “ P. parcepunctus ”. Adecadelateritisimpossibletodeter- minewhatcircumstancesledtothisconfusionofidentities. Havingconsid- eredthesefacts, whilekeepinghisname‘ grandis ’, onlythetwospecimens fromHammond’soriginaltypelocalityofhismanuscriptnameareincluded inthenewtypeseries (includingtheformer‘ holotype’), andastheholotype exactlythesamespecimen (collectedbyThurePalmin 1979 atKaptegariver, tributaryofSuamr.) thatwasusedintheanalysis (aedeagusillustratedinfig. 92, p. 76, MAKRANCZY 2006) is chosen. Almost all of Hammond’s other specimensarefemales, thetwomalesfoundwereinlessthanperfectcondition, onehastheaedeagusdissected (parameresdetached), theotherhasaweakly sclerotizedaedeagus, makingitverytrickytodrawsolidconclusiononthe identitiesofthesespecimens.
MZLU |
Lund University |
MHNG |
Museum d'Histoire Naturelle |
HNHM |
Hungarian Natural History Museum (Termeszettudomanyi Muzeum) |
V |
Royal British Columbia Museum - Herbarium |
NHMW |
Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien |
SMNS |
Staatliches Museum fuer Naturkund Stuttgart |
AMNH |
American Museum of Natural History |
FMNH |
Field Museum of Natural History |
NMPC |
National Museum Prague |
MNHP |
Princeton University |
CNCI |
Canadian National Collection Insects |
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
MRAC |
Musée Royal de l’Afrique Centrale |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |