Trichomycterus

Wolmar B. Wosiacki, 2005, A new species of Trichomycterus (Siluriformes: Trichomycteridae) from south Brazil and redescription of T. iheringi (Eigenmann)., Zootaxa 1040, pp. 49-64 : 50

publication ID

z01040p049

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:19E95D15-4A14-421D-88F0-6E75B6585D50

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6266778

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/607691C9-9366-460B-AEFE-9206B9348F1F

treatment provided by

Thomas

scientific name

Trichomycterus
status

 

[[ Trichomycterus View in CoL View at ENA ]]

Trichomycteridae is a monophyletic group composed of eight subfamilies, 41 genera and about of 173 nominal species (de Pinna & Wosiacki, 2003), with many more to be described. Seven subfamilies are demonstrably monophyletic groups, but Trichomycterinae is the largest and clearly a polyphyletic group of Trichomycteridae (Wosiacki, 2002). Trichomycterinae is composed of five monotypic genera ( Eremophilus   ZBK , Hatcheria   ZBK , Bullockia   ZBK , Silvinichthys   ZBK , and Rhizosomichthys   ZBK ), all defined by autapomorphies, and the genus Trichomycterus with about 100 species (de Pinna & Wosiacki 2003) that form a non-monophyletic group (de Pinna, 1989). Costa & Bockmann (1993) described the genus Ituglanis   ZBK composed of some species formerly included in the genus Trichomycterus . Scleronema   ZBK was proposed as a sister group of Ituglanis   ZBK plus a large intrafamilial clade (Glanapteryginae, Sarcoglanidinae, Tridentinae, Stegophilinae and Vandelliinae) (Costa & Bockmann, 1993), although no subfamilial rank was proposed.

Despite the large number of species already known for “ Trichomycterus ”, many species have been recently described (Barbosa & Costa, 2003; Fernández & Schaefer, 2003; Bockmann & Sazima, 2004; Bockmann et al. 2004; Triques & Vono, 2004; Wosiacki & Garavello, 2004; and Wosiacki, 2004), and the real estimate of the diversity within the genus is far from complete. Species-level identification within Trichomycterus is often precluded by the scarce information available on most nominal species. For these reasons, redescriptions of poorly known species are crucial (Arratia, 1998; Fernández, 2000) to achieve a better taxonomic and systematic knowledge of the genus.

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) CoL Data Package (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF