Rhinotora fonsecai Lopes
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4138.3.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4189EE26-3CDE-4BC0-AB75-84C5E2C9733B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3511131 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5D446B59-FFB9-FF96-27BD-FBDC2B42FEFE |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rhinotora fonsecai Lopes |
status |
|
Rhinotora fonsecai Lopes View in CoL
( Figs 2A–B View FIGURE 2. A – B , 10 View FIGURE 10 )
Rhinotora fonsecai Lopes, 1934: 517 View in CoL . Holotype ♀, MNRJ. Type-locality: Brazil, São Paulo, Capital, Cantareira. Ref.— Lopes 1935: 22, fig. 8, pl. 1, fig. 2 (scutellum, wing).
Neorhinotora fonsecai: Ref. View in CoL — Papavero 1967: 2; Almeida & Ale-Rocha 2008: 1936 View Cited Treatment , figs 1c (wing), 5a (female terminalia), 6a (egg).
Diagnosis. Rhinotora fonsecai is the only Rhinotora species with lobed, instead of spiniform, protuberances on scutellum. This species shares with some specimens of R. travassosi and also with Rhinotoroides the presence of branched supernumerary crossveins on r1. Likewise R. pluricellata , R. salesopolitana , R. spiloptera , and many exemplars of R. lopesi , this species has one simple supernumerary crossvein arising from the middle of R2+3. As in most Rhinotora species, the anterior orbital seta is present.
Redescription. Head ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 A). Mostly yellow, silvery to golden pruinose. Anterior reclinate orbital seta short, piliform. Mouthparts brown, clypeus and palpus yellowish. Thorax ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 A). Scutum reddish brown with yellowish regions. Scutellum trapezoidal, with lateral and apical roundish protuberances; base of apical seta prolonged posteriorly. Scutellum mostly reddish brown, yellow at the base of apical seta; silvery pruinose, shiny at the base of apical setae. Wing. Medial vein ratio: 0.46. Veins yellow to brown; C mostly yellow, dark brown on distal two thirds of cell c. Membrane brownish, with many hyaline spots. Cell r1 with three branched and two simple supernumerary crossveins. Cell r2+3 with one simple supernumerary crossvein arising from the middle of R2+3, sometimes another one arising from the apical third of R2+3. Legs. Distal third of mid femur with two rows of short strong ventral setae. Distal third of hind femur with anteroventral and posteroventral rows of strong short setae. Mid tibia with one distinct ventroapical seta. Abdomen. Tergites brown, sternites yellowish brown; brown setulose. Female terminalia. Sternite 8 bilobed, with two rows of setulae; two spherical spermathecae ( Almeida & Ale-Rocha 2008).
Distribution ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 ). Brazil (São Paulo).
Examined type material (seen in 2004). HOLOTYPE ♀ [wing mounted on slide]. “Instituto Biológico/ Rhinotora / fonsecai Lopes / Aza do holotypo/ Cantareira/ S. Paulo/ F. Fonseca col.”. PARATYPE ♀. “ Typus ” [red label]; “Serra Cantareira/ H. Florestal S. Paulo/ F. Fonseca 18-7-934”; “ Rhinotora fonsecai Lopes / H. S. Lopesdet 9-934”.
Remarks. Rhinotora fonsecai was transferred to Neorhinotora Lopes, 1934 , by Papavero (1967) based on the lack of spines on scutellum. In the last review of Neorhinotora species, however, Almeida & Ale-Rocha (2008) argued that the lobed protuberances found in the scutellum of R. fonsecai (two lateral and one apical) are in a similar position to the spiniform protuberances of the scutellum of Rhinotora , suggesting homology between those structures. The authors, despite not having transferred R. fonsecai back to Rhinotora , also stated many features that separate this species from the remaining Neorhinotora , namely head relatively wider, compound eye more obliquely disposed, clypeus not as well developed, pruinescence finer, scutellum not excavated, female sternite 8 with two rows of setulae instead of one and egg with widespread chorionic reticulation. Considering all these aspects, R. fonsecai is here transferred back to its original genus.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Rhinotora fonsecai Lopes
Calhau, Julia, Coelho, Lívia Aguiar, Kawada, Ricardo, Lima, Felipe Varussa De Oliveira & Guillermo-Ferreira, Rhainer 2016 |
Rhinotora fonsecai
Lopes 1935: 22 |
Lopes 1934: 517 |