Afronirvana Evans

Wang, Yang, Dietrich, Christopher H. & Zhang, Yalin, 2017, Review of two genera of Nirvanini leafhoppers (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Evacanthinae) from Africa, Zootaxa 4231 (3), pp. 431-441 : 432-433

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4231.3.9

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:35DA1B9A-23F1-40D0-BDD7-7D5F2AEDC9AA

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6042574

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5C6D5B43-1864-E517-1EA5-FBD1FBBFFCD5

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Afronirvana Evans
status

 

Afronirvana Evans View in CoL

( Figs 1–26 View FIGURES 1 – 10 View FIGURES 11 – 16 View FIGURES 17 – 26 )

Type species: Afronirvana abrupta Evans, 1955

Diagnosis. This genus differs from all other known genera of Nirvanini in the crown convex and approximately as long as pronotum and distance between eyes, face strongly convex but with median depression, dorsum with median longitudinal dark marking extended from head to forewing apex, and aedeagus straight (not arched) in lateral view with distal extension curved posterobasad and appressed against shaft.

Description. Medium-sized leafhoppers (5.2–6.4 mm long) with dorsal coloration yellow to pale orange, marked with distinct dark longitudinal pattern from head to end of forewing. Head ( Figs 1 View FIGURES 1 – 10 , 11 View FIGURES 11 – 16 , 17 View FIGURES 17 – 26 ) triangularly produced in dorsal view, as long as pronotum and distance between eyes. Crown ( Figs 1 View FIGURES 1 – 10 , 11 View FIGURES 11 – 16 , 17 View FIGURES 17 – 26 ) convex, entire anterior and lateral margins separated from face by distinct carina extended from apex to dorsal end of lateral frontal suture; surface longitudinally rugulose medially with fine irregular striations sublaterally converging towards apex; coronal suture complete but only weakly carinate; ocelli well developed. Face ( Figs 2–3 View FIGURES 1 – 10 , 18–19 View FIGURES 17 – 26 ) strongly convex with median depression, frontoclypeus in profile oblique, ca. 30o from horizontal, surface shagreen, with strong median longitudinal carina on dorsal half and dorsolateral oblique rugae developed; antenna as long as combined length of crown and pronotum; antennal ledge well developed; lateral frontal suture extended to lateral margin of crown; anteclypeus convex, apex rounded, extended to margin of gena; lorum small, narrow, well-separated from lateral margin of gena; gena with lateral margin evenly rounded below eye, almost completely concealing proepisternum. Pronotum ( Figs 1 View FIGURES 1 – 10 , 11 View FIGURES 11 – 16 , 17 View FIGURES 17 – 26 ) slightly wider than head, anterior margin roundly produced, posterior margin slightly concave; lateral margin less than half as long as eye, carinate, carina even with posterior corner of eye. Exposed part of mesonotum and scutellum ( Figs 1 View FIGURES 1 – 10 , 11 View FIGURES 11 – 16 , 17 View FIGURES 17 – 26 ) together shorter than pronotum, scutellar suture distinct, reaching lateral margin. Forewing with venation obscure in basal two-thirds; with four apical cells; appendix very narrow. Hindwing with four apical cells, R2+3 with basal section between wing margin and R stem absent. Front femur with setae AM1 and AV1 enlarged; intercalary row with ca. 8 setae; row AV with ca. 8 short setae at distal half; PV setae absent. Front tibia slender, cylindrical, with two dorsoapical setae, row AV with ca. 8 enlarged setae and ca. 8 short setae. Hind femur macrosetal formula 2+1+1; tibia with ca. 12, 22, 30, and 13 setae in rows AD, PD, PV, and AV, respectively; tarsus elongate, tarsomere I with pair of dorsoapical setae and two longitudinal rows of plantar setae, pecten of tarsomeres I and II each with 3 tapered setae and 2 platellae.

Male abdomen with 1S apodemes well developed ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 17 – 26 ). Pygofer ( Figs 4 View FIGURES 1 – 10 , 20 View FIGURES 17 – 26 ) short and well sclerotized, lateral lobe broadly rounded, with sclerotized ventral process and several posterodorsal macrosetae. Anal tube ( Figs 10 View FIGURES 1 – 10 , 21 View FIGURES 17 – 26 ) large, tapering distad, with pair of large triangular basolateral expansions ventrally. Subgenital plate ( Figs 9 View FIGURES 1 – 10 , 26 View FIGURES 17 – 26 ) weakly subsegmented near base, with longitudinal row of ventral macrosetae and numerous long hairlike setae. Style ( Figs 6 View FIGURES 1 – 10 , 23 View FIGURES 17 – 26 ) with apodeme and apophysis colinear and subequal in length; lateral lobe weak with numerous conspicuous setae, apex footlike and expanded laterally. Connective ( Figs 6 View FIGURES 1 – 10 , 23 View FIGURES 17 – 26 ) Y-shaped with median anterior process, stem longer than arms. Aedeagus ( Figs 7, 8 View FIGURES 1 – 10 , 24, 25 View FIGURES 17 – 26 ) without preatrium and dorsal apodeme, shaft almost straight, with short unpaired spikelike ventral basal process posteriorly and paired distal processes, gonopore subapical on ventral surface.

Female with sternite VII produced medially ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 11 – 16 ); first valvula in lateral view ( Figs 13, 16 View FIGURES 11 – 16 ) slender and evenly curved in basal half, distal half nearly straight, width same through most of length, apical fifth tapered, with dorsal sculpturing oblique imbricate on distal half, ventral preapical sculpturing irregularly denticulate; second valvula ( Figs 12, 15 View FIGURES 11 – 16 ) curved, with toothed distal blade less than half total length, slightly broadened, with smaller teeth between larger ones.

Distribution. Africa ( Cameroon; Nigeria; Democratic Republic of Congo).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hemiptera

Family

Cicadellidae

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF