<Unknown Taxon>

Jarvis, Charlie, 2007, Chapter 7: Linnaean Plant Names and their Types (part O), Order out of Chaos. Linnaean Plant Types and their Types, London: Linnaean Society of London in association with the Natural History Museum, pp. 696-717 : 699

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5BDBD03D-2635-136F-0ABC-6DB0231BEE96

treatment provided by

Admin

scientific name

 
status

 

Omphalea triandra Linnaeus, Systema Naturae, ed. 10, 2: 1264. 1759, typ. cons.

[“Habitat in Jamaica.”] Sp. Pl., ed. 2, 2: 1377 (1763). RCN: 7101.

Type not designated.

Original material: Herb. Linn. No. 1102.1 (LINN); [icon] in Browne, Civ. Nat. Hist. Jamaica: 335, t. 22, f. 4. 1756.

Generitype of Omphalea Linnaeus, nom. cons.

Current name: Omphalea triandra L. (Euphorbiaceae).

Note: Omphalea Linnaeus, nom. cons, against Omphalandria P. Browne.

Omphalea triandra presents particular difficulties because the original material, a Patrick Browne specimen (1102.1 LINN) and Browne’s cited illustration (t. 22, f. 4) are identifiable as Pouteria multiflora (A. DC.) Eyma (Sapotaceae). Gillespie (in Jarvis & al., Regnum Veg. 127: 70. 1993) designated a Swartz collection in Herb. Thunberg (No. 22721, UPS) as a neotype. As explained by Jarvis & al., l.c.: 6. 1993), with the non adoption of the NCU proposals with which their Linnaean Generic List was linked, this neotypification is untenable because original material is in existence. It appears that a conservation proposal is necessary if Omphalea (Euphorbiaceae, and itself conserved) is not to become the correct name for Pouteria (Sapotaceae).

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF