<Unknown Taxon>
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5BDBD03D-2635-136F-0ABC-6DB0231BEE96 |
treatment provided by |
Admin |
scientific name |
|
status |
|
Omphalea triandra Linnaeus, Systema Naturae, ed. 10, 2: 1264. 1759, typ. cons.
[“Habitat in Jamaica.”] Sp. Pl., ed. 2, 2: 1377 (1763). RCN: 7101.
Type not designated.
Original material: Herb. Linn. No. 1102.1 (LINN); [icon] in Browne, Civ. Nat. Hist. Jamaica: 335, t. 22, f. 4. 1756.
Generitype of Omphalea Linnaeus, nom. cons.
Current name: Omphalea triandra L. (Euphorbiaceae).
Note: Omphalea Linnaeus, nom. cons, against Omphalandria P. Browne.
Omphalea triandra presents particular difficulties because the original material, a Patrick Browne specimen (1102.1 LINN) and Browne’s cited illustration (t. 22, f. 4) are identifiable as Pouteria multiflora (A. DC.) Eyma (Sapotaceae). Gillespie (in Jarvis & al., Regnum Veg. 127: 70. 1993) designated a Swartz collection in Herb. Thunberg (No. 22721, UPS) as a neotype. As explained by Jarvis & al., l.c.: 6. 1993), with the non adoption of the NCU proposals with which their Linnaean Generic List was linked, this neotypification is untenable because original material is in existence. It appears that a conservation proposal is necessary if Omphalea (Euphorbiaceae, and itself conserved) is not to become the correct name for Pouteria (Sapotaceae).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.