Rafapicobia, Skoracki., 2011
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4113.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8B8CDC5A-304F-407F-A06F-F350F916DCD1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4624159 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/58448787-A544-3F68-8EF3-FF0DFA785DFC |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rafapicobia |
status |
|
Key to species of the genus Rafapicobia View in CoL
(Females)
1. Setae ve situated distinctly posteromedial to setae vi .......... R. brotogeris Fain, Bochkov and Mironov, 2000 View in CoL comb. nov.
- Setae ve situated posterior or posterolateral to setae vi, both setae in close proximity............................... 2
2. Setae ag2 45–60 long................................................................................. 3
- Setae ag2 10–20 long................................................................................. 4
3. Each lateral branch of peritremes with 4–5 well visible chambers. Length ratios of setae vi: si and f1: f2 1:3 and 1:1.5 respectively. Genital plate absent.......................................................... R. zirnitra Skoracki, 2011 View in CoL
- Each lateral branch of peritremes with ill-visible chambers. Length ratios of setae vi: si and f1: f2 1:5–5.6 and 1:5 respectively. Genital plate present............................................. R. toxostoma Sikora, Fajfer and Skoracki, 2011 View in CoL
4. Two longitudinal agenital plates present.................................................................. 5
- Agenital plates absent................................................................................. 6
5. Agenital plates punctate. Two hysteronotal shields present. Length of setae h1 65–70................................................................................................. R. thamnophili Glowska and Schmidt, 2014 View in CoL
- Agenital plates apunctate. Hysteronotal shields absent. Length of setae h1 7–10.................................................................................................. R. lepidocolaptesi Skoracki and Solarczyk, 2012 View in CoL
6. Hysteronotal shields present............................................................................ 7
- Hysteronotal shields absent............................................................................ 8
7. Length ratios of setae f1: f2 and f1: h1 1:4.8–5.5 and 2:1................ R. dendrocolaptesi Skoracki and Solarczyk, 2012 View in CoL
- Length ratios of setae f1: f2 and f1: h1 1:1 and 1:2–3.5........................ R. milenskyi Glowska and Schmidt, 2014 View in CoL
8. Lenght ratios of setae f1: f2 and f1: h1 1:5 and 1:1 respectively. Coxal fields III and IV punctate............................................................................. R. melzeri Skoracki, Unsoeld, Skorupski and Kavetska, 2014 View in CoL
- Lenght ratios of setae f1: f2 and f1: h1 1:2.2–2.3 and 2:1 respectively. Coxal fields III and IV punctate....................................................................... R. ramphastos Fain, Bochkov and Mironov, 2000 View in CoL comb. nov.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SuperOrder |
Acariformes |
Order |
|
SubOrder |
Prostigmata |
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Picobiinae |