Camarotoscena Haupt, 1935
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.3897/alpento.9.172655 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F1BD3B42-5D0C-48C8-BFE7-D9F961563769 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17806228 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/57B01617-028D-5E92-AB7E-646ACA1F5377 |
|
treatment provided by |
|
|
scientific name |
Camarotoscena Haupt |
| status |
|
Camarotoscena Haupt View in CoL View at ENA
Camarotoscena Haupt (1935): 228; Type species: Rhinocola speciosa Flor, 1861, by original designation. View in CoL
Diagnosis.
Adult and fifth instar immature by Burckhardt et al. (2024).
Character assessment.
Camarotoscena is morphologically very homogeneous ( Loginova 1975 b), both in the adult and immature stages. Adults. Body colour in most species ochreous or light brown with irregularly spaced small brown to dark brown dots (Fig. 2 A, D, J, M, P View Figure 2 ) and whitish or yellowish forewings with sparser or denser small brown dots (Fig. 2 B, E, K, N, Q View Figure 2 ); according to Loginova (1975 b), the dark pattern is reduced in young specimens, an observations we could not confirm; the dark colour in young specimens is lighter but not reduced. In C. subrubescens Flor, 1861 and C. trjapitzini Loginova, 1968 , the colour of the body (Fig. 2 G, S View Figure 2 ) and forewings (Fig. 2 H, T View Figure 2 ) can be yellow or bright orange to ochreous without or with sparse dark dots (Fig. 1 C View Figure 1 ). In some specimens, that we cannot assign to a particular species with certainty, the forewing pattern is intermediate between C. speciosa and C. subrubescens (Fig. 1 D View Figure 1 ). In C. trjapitzini Loginova, 1968 , the dark colour on body and forewings can be quite extensive. The forewing membrane is whitish in most species but yellow or light brown, at least in some areas, in C. badia Loginova, 1965 , C. fulgidipennis , C. hoberlandti , C. subrubescens and C. trjapitzini . The body length ranges usually between 2.0– 2.5 mm with some specimens smaller or larger. Only C. lauta Loginova, 1975 is distinctly larger with 2.8–3.2 mm body length. The integument of the head and thorax is irregularly reticulate (in C. lauta , C. personata , C. speciosa ). Sometimes the reticulation on the vertex is slightly reduced (in C. fulgidipennis , C. subrubescens ) or completely absent (in C. hoberlandti ). The forewing membrane is semi-transparent in C. badia , C. fulgidipennis and C. trjapitzini but subopaque in the other species. The surface spinules on the forewing are mostly very dense (Fig. 2 L, O, R, U View Figure 2 ) and can be coarser as in C. speciosa (Fig. 2 R View Figure 2 ) or finer as in C. subrubescens (Fig. 2 U View Figure 2 ). The surface spinules are sparser in C. hoberlandti and C. trjapitzini where they form sometimes transverse rows (Fig. 2 F, I View Figure 2 ) and in C. fulgidipennis were they form small groups of two to four spinules (Fig. 2 C View Figure 2 ). In most species the male proctiger is tubular and widest in basal third; only in C. lauta (Fig. 4 A View Figure 4 ) and C. personata (Fig. 4 D View Figure 4 ) the male proctiger has posterior lobes and is, in lateral view, widest in the middle. The male subgenital plate is subspherical in most species (Figs 3 A, F, K View Figure 3 , 4 D, G, J View Figure 4 ) but elongate in C. lauta (Fig. 3 A View Figure 3 ). In most species, the paramere, in lateral view, is digitiform with a bend in the middle (Figs 3 B, D, G, I, L View Figure 3 , 4 H, K View Figure 4 ) but it is lamellar in C. lauta and C. personata (Fig. 4 B, E View Figure 4 ). The female proctiger is usually cuneate with the dorsal outline almost straight and the apex subacute; the apical third is covered with moderately long setae (Fig. 5 A – D, G, H View Figure 5 ). In C. lauta , the dorsal margin of the proctiger, in lateral view, is concave and the apical third covered with short bristles, distinctly shorter than those in basal third laterally (Fig. 5 F View Figure 5 ). The female subgenital plate, in lateral view, is in most species irregularly cuneate with a short apical process (Fig. 5 A – C, G, H View Figure 5 ). In C. personata the apical process is long (Fig. 5 D View Figure 5 ). In C. bianchii and C. lauta the subgenital plate is, in lateral view, square (Fig. 5 E View Figure 5 ) or subtrapezoidal (Fig. 5 F View Figure 5 ), respectively. Fifth instar immature. Immatures are known only of five species: C. fulgidipennis , C. hoberlandti , C. speciosa , C. subrubescens and C. trjapitzini (Fig. 6 A – E View Figure 6 ). The dorsal sclerites on the head, thorax and abdomen are brown to dark brown in most species (Fig. 6 A, C – E View Figure 6 ) but light in C. hoberlandti (Fig. 6 B View Figure 6 ). In C. fulgidipennis , C. hoberlandti and C. trjapitzini , the setae on the dorsal surface of the forewing pads are sparser and slightly shorter and sectasetae are almost completely absent (Fig. 6 F View Figure 6 ); in C. speciosa and C. subrubescens the dorsal setae are more numerous, denser and slightly longer with more sectasetae (Fig. 6 G – I View Figure 6 ). The caudal plate consists of three transverse rows of irregularly spaced setae and sectasetae (Fig. 7 A – E View Figure 7 ). Their relative length in longitudinal body direction and that of their intervals varies between species. The ventrite bearing the circumanal ring is strongly sclerotised and well-delimited anteriorly in C. speciosa and C. subrubescens (Fig. 7 F View Figure 7 ) but unsclerotised and not clearly delimited anteriorly in the other species (Fig. 8 A – C View Figure 8 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
SuperFamily |
Psylloidea |
|
Family |
Camarotoscena Haupt
| Burckhardt, Daniel, Haseen, Cherukad, He, Zhixin, Luo, Xinyu, Pramatarova, Monika, Grimaud, Sylvain, Hussain, Barkat, Song, Fan & Serbina, Liliya Štarhová 2025 |
Camarotoscena
| Haupt H 1935: 228 |
