Drosophila chichu, Peñafiel-Vinueza & Rafael, 2019
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2019.494 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:60C94F41-D9CB-471A-BAB7-2D558F2D3357 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5940644 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/53544669-FF9D-FFA9-EE47-FC54FE4DD6F3 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Drosophila chichu |
status |
sp. nov. |
Drosophila chichu View in CoL sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:3F0DBF0C-E97E-4291-AE59-E298DC96AF7A
Fig. 5 View Fig. 5
Diagnosis
Aristae with 5 dorsal and 2 ventral branches plus terminal fork. Two prominent oral bristles, 2 nd slightly smaller than 1 st. Thorax yellowish brown. Legs yellowish brown. Wings yellowish brown, dM-Cu slightly clouded. Abdomen yellow with dorsal midline, from 2 nd to 5 th tergites with triangular pigmentation which becomes thinner laterally, 6 th tergite with median spot. Cerci not fused to epandrium. Hypandrium shield-shaped. Gonopod bearing one long bristle. Aedeagus sclerotized and tubular, with a basal ventral bump, ventrally with an apical concavity. Paraphyses fused to gonopod bearing one bristle.
Etymology
In the Kichwa language, ‘ chichu ’ = ‘pregnant’. The aedeagus has a ventral bump which resembles a woman’s pregnant abdomen.
Material examined
Holotype
ECUADOR • ♂ (dissected, terminalia in microvial); Loja Prov., Cajanuma , 2800 m a.s.l.; 04°06′58.9″ S, 79°10′11.9″ W; 19 Nov. 2015; A. Peñafiel leg.; A. Peñafiel and V. Rafael det.; QCAZ-I 3356. GoogleMaps
Paratype
ECUADOR • 1 ♂ (dissected, terminalia in microvial); same data as for holotype; QCAZ-I 3357 . GoogleMaps
Description
Male Holotype external morphology: total length (body + wings) 4.67 mm, body length 3.56 mm. Body color yellowish brown.
HEAD. Aristae with 5 dorsal and 2 ventral branches plus terminal fork and small hairs. Orbital plate yellowish brown, frontal length 0.33 mm; frontal index = 0.68, top to bottom width ratio = 1.35. Medial vertical seta closer to lateral vertical seta, vt index = 0.87; or1–or3 and or2–or1 ratio could not be calculated (broken setae on holotype). Ocellar triangle yellowish brown, ocellus yellow. Cheek index = 6.5. Two oral bristles, 2 nd slightly smaller than 1 st bristle, vibrissa index = 1.07. Carina not sulcate. Red eyes. Eye index = 1.20.
THORAX. Yellowish brown, thorax length 0.89 mm, acrostichal hairs in 2 rows between two anterior dorsocentral setae. h index = 0.79; dc index could not be calculated (broken setae on holotype). Medial katepisternal seta slightly smaller than anterior seta. Legs yellowish brown.
WINGS. Yellowish brown, dM-Cu slightly clouded. Alar length 2.86 mm, alar width 1.33 mm. Alar indices: alar = 2.12; C = 3.24; ac = 2.10; hb = 0.19; 4c = 0.64; 4v = 1.22; 5x = 1.42; M = 0.42 and prox. x = 0.41.
ABDOMEN. Yellow with dorsal midline, 1 st tergite yellowish brown, 2 nd to 5 th tergites with triangular pigmentation which becomes thinner laterally, 6 th tergite with a median spot ( Fig. 5A View Fig. 5 ).
MALE TERMINALIA. Epandrium dorsally microtrichose, with 2 lower bristles, ventral lobe with 3 bristles on each side. Cerci microtrichose and not fused to epandrium. Surstylus with 10 primary teeth on right side and 9 on left, 10 marginal bristles on each side ( Fig. 5B View Fig. 5 ). Hypandrium shield-shaped, slightly sclerotized. Gonopod bearing one bristle ( Fig. 5C View Fig. 5 ).
AEDEAGUS. Sclerotized and tubular with a basal ventral bump, ventrally with an apical concavity, dorsally membranous, with bright studs. Ventral rod absent. Paraphyses fused to gonopod bearing one bristle. Aedeagal apodeme sclerotized and curved ( Fig. 5D–F View Fig. 5 ).
Distribution
Known only from the type locality.
Relationship to other species
This species belongs to the tripunctata group. The general shape of the male terminalia, particularly that of the aedeagus, suggests a relationship with D. cundinamarca Vilela & Bächli, 2000 and D. pilaresae Vela & Rafael, 2001 .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |