Megapogon pollicaris ( Jenkin, 1908 )

Alvizu, Adriana, Xavier, Joana R. & Rapp, Hans Tore, 2019, Description of new chiactine-bearing sponges provides insights into the higher classification of Calcaronea (Porifera: Calcarea), Zootaxa 4615 (2), pp. 201-251 : 236-238

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4615.2.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9B9884DA-18D5-4BC9-950F-0436E075AAF8

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5584077

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/513F790D-FFF6-FF9D-E994-D1A7FCAC4F8B

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Megapogon pollicaris ( Jenkin, 1908 )
status

 

Megapogon pollicaris ( Jenkin, 1908) View in CoL

( Figs 16 View FIGURE 16 A–H; Table 12 View TABLE 12 )

Original description. Jenkin 1908, p. 40, pl. XXXVII and XXXVIII, figs. 125–130.

Type locality. Winter Quarters Bay , Antarctic .

Synonym and citations. Megapogon pollicaris, Burton 1963, p. 93 .

Material examined. Holotype: BMNH-1907.8.6.135 (one fragment and three slides), Winter Quarters Bay , Antarctic, National Antarctic Expedition ( HMS Discovery).

Morphology. There is only one fragment of the holotype. Dark brown coloration because it was fixed in osmic acid ( Jenkin 1908). Surface slightly hispid. Oscular region absent in the fragment. Size of the fragment 3.5 mm large, 2.3 mm wide and 0.6 mm thick ( Fig 16A View FIGURE 16 ). The aquiferous system is leuconoid composed of rounded inhalant cavities under the cortex, and round choanocyte chambers which are scattered in the choanosome ( Fig 16B View FIGURE 16 ).

Skeleton. Cortical skeleton formed by triactines tangentially placed and large projecting diactines ( Fig 16C View FIGURE 16 ). Choanoskeleton composed of the unpaired actines of the atrial chiactines, which can project outside the surface ( Figs 16 View FIGURE 16 D–E). A few triactines can also be present in the choanosome, with the unpaired actines pointing towards the cortical skeleton ( Fig 16E View FIGURE 16 ). Abundant spined microdiactines are irregularly scattered in the choanosome ( Fig 16F View FIGURE 16 ). Atrial skeleton made up by chiactines with the paired actines placed tangentially, and the apical actines projecting into the atrial cavity ( Fig 16B View FIGURE 16 ).

Spicules. Diactines: large and bent towards the distal end which is blunt and thicker than the proximal end ( Fig 16G View FIGURE 16 ). Size: 506.8 ± 43.1 µm length, 20.0 ± 3.4 µm width ( Table 12 View TABLE 12 ).

Microdiactines: small, curved and spined. One hastate end and the other sharply pointed ( Figs 16F, 16H View FIGURE 16 ). Size: 60.1 ± 4.0 µm length, 2.8 ± 0.5 µm width ( Table 12 View TABLE 12 ).

Cortical triactines: sagittal with straight and long unpaired actines. Paired actines shorter, nearly straight or slightly irregular ( Fig 16H View FIGURE 16 ). Size: unpaired actines 289.5 ± 64.0 µm length, 11.5 ± 2.1 µm width; paired actines 182.2 ± 22.7 µm length, 10.8 ± 2.7 µm width ( Table 12 View TABLE 12 ).

Chiactines: unpaired actines straight and longer than the paired ones. Apical actines short and acerate ( Figs 16B, 16G View FIGURE 16 ). Size: unpaired actines 338.9 ± 106.8 µm length, 12.9 ± 2.1 µm width; paired actines 204.5 ± 22.6 µm length, 12.7 ± 2.3 µm width; apical actines 81.2 ± 13.8 µm length, 10.0 ± 1.4 µm width ( Table 12 View TABLE 12 ).

Distribution and depth. Specimens taken around Winter Quarters Bay, Antarctic shallow waters ( Jenkin 1908).

Molecular identification. Not available.

Remarks. After re-examining the holotype of M. pollicaris (BMNH-1907.8.6.135), we found that this species presents similarities with M. raripilus , for example, shape of the diactines and microdiactines, presence of triactines in the atrial skeleton, and size of the spicules. Also, according to Jenkin (1908), M. pollicaris has an oscular collar built up in a similar way as in other species of Megapogon and Achramorpha , i.e. with tetractines and triactines with the unpaired actines pointing downwards, but without an oscular fringe as in M. raripilus . However, these two species show some differences; microdiactines are more abundant in M. pollicaris , diactines are slightly longer in M. raripilus (300–800 µm), and absence of trichoxeas in the cortical skeleton of M. pollicaris . However, it has been suggested that trichoxeas are not very reliable in differentiating species, e.g. in the genera Leucandra ( Rapp 2015) and Clathrina ( Azevedo et al. 2017) . The aquiferous system in both species is leuconoid with rounded choanocyte chambers, which are bigger in M. raripilus (131.2 ± 31.7 µm diameter) µm than in M. pollicaris (109.2 ± 12.5 µm diameter). Also, the rounded inhalant cavities are also slightly bigger in M. raripilus (146.8 ± 36.4 µm diameter) µm than in M. pollicaris (141.9 ± 33.8 µm diameter), but these are more marked and numerous in M. pollicaris .

Based on our observations, we suspect that M. raripilus and M. pollicaris are different but closely related species, however, to be able to have a confident decision, it is necessary to have new and larger specimens of M. pollicaris , for a better examination and for molecular evidence.

HMS

Embrapa Gado de Corte

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF