Cantareus subapertus (Ancey, 1893)
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.876.36472 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:036FEB7C-534C-47A9-88AD-16C5B7DCE853 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/505669E9-0D78-5DD3-80CF-4DABE604E75D |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Cantareus subapertus (Ancey, 1893) |
status |
|
Cantareus subapertus (Ancey, 1893) Figs 5-8 View Figures 5–9 , 10-14 View Figures 10–14 , 25 View Figures 21–25
Helix subaperta : Ancey 1893, Bulletin de la Société Zoologique de France 18(3): 136-138 [la chaîne du Djurdjura, en Kabylie; published 20 June 1893].
Helix mazzuliopsis : Ancey 1893, Bulletin de la Société Zoologique de France 18(3): 136 [name mentioned in footnote; not an available name according to Article 11.6.1 as it has been published as a synonym and has not been treated as an available name before 1961].
Helix mazzulopsis : 1893, Pilsbry, Manual of Conchology (2)8(32): 238, pl. 46, figs 41, 42 [Jurjura Mts., Algeria; published 1 July 1893; lectotype designation by Baker (1963: 258)].
Type specimens.
Mazzulopsis : lectotype ANSP 63133, paralectotype ANSP 459220. subaperta : 3 syntypes, NHMW 7861, NHMW 7862, NHMW 7863; paratypes SMF 75256/8, coll. Nägele ex Ancey, the original label of Ancey contains the additional information "Dra-el-Mizan, 1893".
Specimens examined.
Algeria, Kabylie: Tiguemounine (Ouacif), 1100 m alt. coll. Bouaziz; Ighil Bourmi (Ait Bouaddou), 950 m alt. NMBE 550458; ditto, le. F. Medjoub, NMBE 555649; Ait Houari (Assi Youcef), 1000 m alt. coll. Bouaziz; Tizi Guefres (Iferhounene), 1100 m alt coll. Bouaziz. The Senckenberg Research Institute houses> 30 shells of this species, all of them from “Kabylie” and/or “Djudjura”.
Description.
Shell medium sized to large, thin, globose with a broad to relatively acute conical spire; protoconch whitish, large, with a diameter of up to 6 mm and 2.5 smooth whorls; basic shell colour olive yellowish with up to five separate brown spiral bands; teleoconch covered by a dense granulation, sometimes accompanied by very fine, deep spirals; teleoconch usually covered by irregularly arranged riblets of even ribs, usually stronger around the umbilical area; periostracum thick, often preserved on the shell in small patches; in eroded shells, ribs and riblets whitish; aperture large, elongate oval, slightly thickened forming a lip callus, with a parietal callus in fully adult specimens; aperture whitish inside, with the spiral bands shining through the thin shell; peristome sharp; umbilicus closed, periomphalum covered by a thickened calcareous layer.
Genital organs.
Penis short, epiphallus reaching at least three times the length of penis, mrp attaching in the distal third of epiphallus; flagellum twice the length of the epiphallus; penial lumen smooth, pp2 a short broad papilla with a central perforation structured by thick annuli, pp1 a blind papilla, the epiphallial pore in a lateral position; distal epiphallial lumen with broad pilasters, the proximal lumen with elongated ridges.
Vagina short, stem of pedunculus thickened and short, diverticulum longer than the vesicle stem + vesicle, longer than the flagellum; glandulae mucosae longer than the dart sac, with a thickened basal part and two subsequent ramifications, tubules thin and weak, less than 10 tubules per stem; atrium dominated by a massive stimulator.
Measurements.
Syntypes figured (n = 4): H = 26 mm; D = 27.5 mm; PH = 17.7 mm; PD = 15.4 mm.
Distribution.
As far as known, this species is restricted to the Djudjura Mts., where it inhabits quite high altitudes. It also occurs in the northern promontory of this mountain ridge.
Remarks.
In the description of Helix subaperta , Ancey (1893) mentioned in a footnote that he already shared this species under the name H. mazzuliopsis with his correspondents. Pilsbry’s shells (1893) were purchased from a shell dealer (see label in Fig. 8E View Figures 5–9 ) bearing the name H. mazzulopsis , which he consequently used! Moreover, Pilsbry remarks: "I have been unable to find any description or mention of this form in the literature"; thus, H. mazzulopsis cannot be considered an emendation or an incorrect subsequent spelling of H. mazzuliopsis . Strictly speaking, he introduced a new name, and corrected his error two years later in the "Index to Helices" ( Pilsbry 1895: 120) with the note "For H. mazzulopsis read H. subaperta . Ancey’s description appeared June 20; that in Man. Conch., July 1".
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |